USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Noteworthy Practices

New York State Department of Transportation Applies Systemic Planning Process to Lane Departure Crashes on State Highway System

Original publication: FHWA Safety Program | Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool | New York Case Study(PDF, 186kB)


Overview of Practice

The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) used the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool to identify sites where safety could be improved by deploying low-cost countermeasures on roadways with a high crash risk rather than just focusing on specific sites with a history of severe crashes.

Results

The Tool is beneficial because it provides a process to identify locations that would benefit from safety-related improvements that would not otherwise be identified through the traditional site-specific analysis process. The Tool also is flexible enough to be applied by NYSDOT staff in a central location and disseminated to region staff or to be applied by region staff at the local level. The countermeasures identified during the pilot along with the documentation of segment mileages with risk factors present will be useful tools in future systemic safety program development.

Contact

Regina Doyle
Office of Traffic Safety and Mobility
New York State Department of Transportation
RDoyle@dot.ny.gov

Missouri Department of Transportation Evaluation of Project Proves Systemic Planning Process is Beneficial

Original publication: FHWA Safety Program | Missouri Case Study(PDF, 202kB)


Overview of Practice

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) used the concepts discussed in the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool to evaluate a project that was developed using a systemic planning process. MoDOT evaluated the effects of adding edge line pavement markings to 570 miles of rural, two-lane State highways with average daily traffic volumes between 400 and 1000 vehicles.

Results

Crash data collected after the project provided proof that implementing low-cost countermeasures on low-volume roads with low-crash frequency and density yields a reduction in crashes. While evidence was stronger for total crashes, there was still a net reduction in fatal and severe injury crashes on improved corridors. Evaluation results can be used by decision-makers to decide whether to continue or discontinue funding or to implement a particular countermeasure for a focus crash type on a focus facility. In this manner, limited safety funding can be appropriately directed to the projects and locations that will produce the most benefit in terms of reduced crashes for the least investment.

Contact

John P. Miller, P.E.
Traffic Safety Engineer
Missouri Department of Transportation
573-526-1759
John.P.Miller@modot.mo.gov

Missouri's Blueprint to Arrive Alive Implements System-Wide Safety Improvements

Original publication: FHWA Safety Program | Systemic In Practice | Missouri(PDF, 279kB)


Overview of Practice

Missouri is one state that has been successful in identifying and implementing system-wide improvements. Missouri's Blueprint to Arrive Alive, which is the State's SHSP, identifies their “Targeted 10” strategies in education, enforcement, engineering, and public policy areas. The state uses Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding for many of these strategies, proactively incorporating the installation of rumble strips/stripes, improved signing and delineation, wider pavement markings, and improved shoulders into pavement resurfacing projects.

Results

Since 2007, almost two-thirds of Missouri's HSIP funds have been allocated to system-wide improvements. While overall results cannot be attributed to specific safety improvements, the evidence is compelling. Between 2005 and 2011, Missouri has seen a 37.5 percent drop in overall fatalities and a 46 percent reduction in lane departure fatalities. In addition, since the installation of cable median barriers on the Interstate system throughout the State, there has been an 80 percent reduction in cross-median crash fatalities on Missouri freeways.

"Line graph titled 'Freeway Cross-Median Fatalities and Median Guard Cable 2002-2011' shows that as Miles of Median Guard Cable increases Cross-Median Fatalities descreases. During the period of greatest increase in Miles of Median Guard Cable, 2004-2006, the greatest decrease in Cross-Medain Fatalities occurred."

Contact

John P. Miller, P.E.
Traffic Safety Engineer
Missouri Department of Transportation
573-526-1759
John.P.Miller@modot.mo.gov

Minnesota Makes Systemic Safety Improvements Based on Risk Assessments at County Level

Original publication: FHWA Safety Program | Practice - Minnesota(PDF, 426kB)


Overview of Practice

Minnesota DOT (Mn/DOT) is another example of a state implementing a systemic approach. While Missouri's approach is focused on state-maintained roadways, Minnesota has taken a different approach through the development of safety plans for each of state's 87 counties. The safety plans disaggregate the severe crash types by each of the AASHTO SHSP emphasis areas to identify emphasis and target crash types at the regional level. Mn/DOT has selected crash surrogates for various facility types to use in the risk assessment. Locations identified and included in the plans can be submitted for project funding through the HSIP.

Results

One example is a risk assessment based on curve radius. Evaluating the data against surrogate risk factors helped Minnesota identify curves with 500-1,200 foot radii to consider for systemic improvements.

"Vertical bar chart that shows that the majority of fatal crashes occurred with a curve radius of between 500 and 1200"

Contact

Bradley Estochen
State Safety Engineer
Minnesota Department of Transportation
651-234-7011
Bradley.Estochen@state.mn.us

Publication Year: 2011

Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Applies Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool on Behalf of Local Agencies

Original publication: Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Applies Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool on Behalf of Local Agencies(PDF, 417kB)


Overview of Practice

The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) applied the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool (Tool) to a local road system. Through the Federal Highway Administration Focus State Initiative, KYTC staff had previously conducted systemic planning focused on roadway departure crashes on State highways. This planning effort, however, did not analyze or suggest any improvements for rural county roads. In 2012, KYTC used the Tool to analyze county roadway corridors on behalf of local agency staff in five counties—Boyle, Bourbon, Franklin, Mercer, and Montgomery.

Results

The Tool proved beneficial for KYTC because it provided an easy-to-apply process to evaluate locally owned and operated roads. Applying the Tool did not require additional data gathering; all the data used in the analysis were based on available photo logs.

Contact

Tracy Lovell, P.E.
Transportation Engineer
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Tracy.Lovell@ky.gov

Driving Under the Influence: Crash Portrayals Teach Young People the Consequences of Dangerous Behaviors Behind the Wheel - Seminole County, Florida


Note: Please view the accompanying video.

You can also view the mock DUI Noteworthy Practice webinar files.

Background

Traffic officials in Seminole County noticed that the county had a problem with teens driving under the influence. For these officials, every young life lost or changed forever from an alcohol-related driving incident was one life too many.

Traditional in-class driving safety education was not helping to get teens to think about the risks of drinking and driving once they were no longer within school walls. Traffic officials had to think bigger, to bring the education out of the classroom, and to dramatize for students the impact that drinking and driving and other risky driving behaviors would have on their friends, family, and society.

Key Challenges

The key challenge in getting a new kind of driving safety education program off the ground was in gaining support and sign-off from the following groups:

  • Partner agencies, including local emergency services
  • The county public school administration
  • Each of the county's nine public schools

Description of Practice

"Screen capture from the safety video shows two cars crashing on a high school field. There is a 'play' button graphic atop the photograph to signify that this image is linked to the video."

The Mock-DUI program, as it was originally named, is a community-wide effort that relies on the participation of concerned citizens, local businesses, high school educators, as well first responders, including fire and police (see participants list at the end of this document). This program educates young drivers on the stark consequences of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol and driving while texting, speeding, or not using safety belts, with a full portrayal of a crash caused by one of these dangerous behaviors.

Juniors and seniors at all nine public high schools and at one private school in Seminole County will see the portrayal once during their high school careers. Organizers try to hold the portrayal shortly before a major school event, such as Homecoming, and it is typically held on the school's athletic fields. All teenage actors are students at the school where the portrayal is held. The portrayal begins with an introduction from a member of local law enforcement, who tells students that the portrayal is not meant to scare them, but to present facts.

A young man then drives across the field to his date's house to pick her up for a dance. The couple says goodbye to her parents and promise she'll be back by midnight. They drive away. Instead of going to the dance, they go to a party. Soon there is a loud bang and smoke. Two hidden cars are revealed, wrecked; the car driven by the young man has hit another car. He is unharmed but his date has been killed and two people in the other car are badly injured—they are maimed, or have suffered brain damage. Real emergency service personnel arrive and use the Jaws of Life to remove the injured, and a Medevac helicopter lands on the field to take one of the injured to a hospital. The young man is given a field sobriety test, he is arrested, and faces decades in prison. A hearse arrives to remove the body of the young woman.

"Screen capture from the safety video shows a police officer riding a motorcyle on the track around a high school field while students watch from the stands"

For the rest of the day, the actor playing the arrested young man is not in school, while a single rose is placed on the desk of the actress playing the young woman who was killed.

Results

Local trends show fewer fatalities from teens driving under the influence since the program began in 2002. There is also anecdotal evidence that students are more aware of risky driving behaviors. For the first 10 years of the program, Seminole County traffic officials received written summaries from teens who had watched the portrayal, to understand how much they learned, retained, and how the program could be tweaked. Transportation officials drew on this deep knowledge pool to improve the program and build on past successes. The program grew to include more law enforcement and emergency personnel and more vehicles so that the portrayal would most accurately reflect a real crash.

A mother recently told Seminole County transportation officials that her daughter had put the lessons learned to good use. Days after a portrayal her daughter went to a dance and noticed that a friend who was supposed to drive her home was acting strangely. She did not get in the car, and that friend crashed. The mother appreciated that her daughter had absorbed the lessons from the Seminole County risky driving portrayal.

Benefits Realized

The primary benefits have been greater student engagement in thinking about risky driving behaviors, and improved multi-agency training. The creators of the risky driving portrayal program have developed a template for staging the enactment. Several counties and schools districts have contacted Seminole County to learn about bringing the program to their students.

Community Participation in the Mock DUI Event

Local Citizens:

"Photograph of a hovering helicopter with the words 'Air Care Team' on the side"
  • John and Sally Shepard - Brain injury survivors

High Schools:

  • Seminole County Public Schools:
  • Crooms Academy
  • Hagerty High
  • Lake Brantley High
  • Lake Howell High
  • Lake Mary High
  • Lyman High
  • Oviedo High
  • Seminole High
  • Winter Springs High
  • Trinity Preparatory School

Businesses:

  • Baldwin-Fairchild Funeral Home
  • C&S Towing
  • AAA/Auto Club South
  • MTRecycling
  • Nationwide Insurance

Agencies:

  • Altamonte Springs Police Department
  • Casselberry Police Department
  • Casselberry Fire Department
  • Lake Mary Police Department
  • Lake Mary Fire Department
  • Longwood Police Department
  • Longwood Fire Department
  • Oviedo Police Department
  • Oviedo Fire Department
  • Sanford Police Department
  • Sanford Fire Department
  • Winter Springs Police Department
  • Florida Highway Patrol
  • Seminole County Fire Department
  • Seminole County Sheriff's Office
  • Seminole County State Attorney's Office

Contact

Robin Butler
Seminole County Fire Department
407-665-5641
rbutler@seminolecountyfl.gov

Washington Integrates its SHSP with Other State Plans and Programs

The Washington practice is discussed after the following introduction about SHSP integration.

Other states in this SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices series: DE, ID, ME, MD, ND


Introduction to SHSP Integration

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is a statewide-coordinated safety plan that provides a comprehensive framework for reducing the number of deaths and serious injuries on all public roads. In each State, the SHSP identifies the State's safety goals, objectives and key emphasis areas. It is intended to serve as an ‘umbrella’ plan that is integrated into other State transportation plans and guides the State's roadway safety investment decisions.

Integration Defined

Integration is the act of bringing together or incorporating various parts into a whole. Integration is relevant and important to a State's planning process because every State has numerous transportation plans; each one potentially addressing safety in a different way. The SHSP is the mechanism to bring these safety “parts” together to form a consistent and “whole” safety program for the State.

The Purpose and Benefits of Integration

The purpose of integration is to coordinate and focus the State's roadway safety efforts to maximize the State's ability to save lives.

Through integration, the safety needs of the State can be addressed more strategically and resources can be shared more effectively. As illustrated in Figure 1, integration encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly to save lives.

"Image shows three boxes pointing to one circle. The three boxes are above the circle. From right to left, the boxes read:  'Collective Action,' 'Common Goal(s),' and 'Leveraged Resources.' The circle reads 'Lives Saved.' The figure represents an integration process that encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly, to save lives."

Other potential integration benefits include:

  • The use of consistent data and analysis methods.
  • Improved allocation of resources to more effectively produce safety improvements.
  • Improvements to safety culture across State, regional, and local agencies.
  • A reduction in the administrative burden on States and local agencies.

Integration of Plans and Processes

State transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans. The relationship of these plans is illustrated in Figure 2.

"The image is a work flow that shows the various state transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with. These include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans."

An integrated SHSP positions the State DOT and its safety partners to collectively address the State's safety challenges on all public roads through coordination and consistency among with the following State and regional plans and programs:

  • LRTPs to promote a long-range vision that incorporates safety priorities.
  • HSIP projects to be consistent with the SHSP emphasis areas and strategies.
  • STIPS/TIPS to align programming of projects with SHSP strategies and countermeasures.
  • CVSPs to facilitate exchange and collaboration between the commercial motor vehicle safety community and the broader safety community.
  • HSPs to ensure a consistent, data-driven approach to improving highway safety, especially in SHSP emphasis areas.

In addition, the SHSP should integrate with city and county planning processes to ensure consideration of safety concerns on all road types.

SHSP Integration Indicators

Indicators that the SHSP and other transportation plans and processes are integrated include the following:

  • Other transportation plans incorporate elements of the SHSP and include consistent and supporting safety goals, performance measures, objectives, and strategies.
  • The priorities and goals of other transportation programs and plans are considered when developing the SHSP.
  • Safety partners have access to and use of common safety data, analysis, and methods for determining safety priorities.
  • The SHSP is developed with sustained input from disciplines and agencies representing the 4Es of safety (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency medical services).
  • Safety partners assist in the implementation of SHSP strategies.
  • SHSP stakeholders and experts are included in other transportation planning processes.
  • SHSP priorities and strategies are considered in project prioritization and programming.
  • Various sources of funding are used to achieve safety goals.
  • Progress towards safety goals is measured jointly and regularly.

Washington

Background

The Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC) is an autonomous state agency responsible for coordinating traffic safety efforts throughout the state of Washington and leading the strategic highway safety plan (known as Target Zero®) development. The WTSC is made up of ten commissioners from State, county, and city government and is chaired by the Governor. The Steering Committee for updating Target Zero® includes representatives from 17 organizations including State, regional, Tribal, and nonprofit agencies. In addition, multi-agency teams have been established to analyze the data and identify and evaluate safety strategies based on stakeholder input.

Target Zero® is a “practitioner's plan” intended to unite the contributing agencies and organizations. The plan will coordinate traffic safety programs, better align priorities and strategies, and provide a common language and approach to traffic safety efforts across Washington State. The plan is data-driven, identifying the factors contributing to fatality and serious injury collisions on Washington roadways, as well as pointing out proven and recommended strategies for reducing traffic deaths and serious injuries.

SHSP Integration Practices

Collaborative Development

The WTSC and the WSDOT have worked collaboratively over the years to develop the SHSP and have established a set of model practices for soliciting and incorporating input from a diverse array of stakeholders when updating their Target Zero® plan. Partner organizations from all over the state have multiple opportunities to provide input—through surveys, active participation in a partners' meeting, and by submitting comments and ideas on drafts of the Plan.

To solicit input from partners throughout the State, the Steering Committee issued a survey and held a day-long partners meeting. For the partners meeting, the Steering Committee invited over 800 participants from public, nonprofit, and private organizations across the State. Approximately 180 participants attended the meeting representing Federal and state agencies, Native American Tribes, local law enforcement agencies, local transportation departments, state legislators, advocacy groups, regional planning councils, and technology companies. At the partners' meeting, WTSC presented statewide traffic safety data and held group strategy discussions with partners on safety priority areas, soliciting ideas. Those facilitated discussions resulted in lists of potential strategies to address each priority area.

Following the partner meeting, subject matter experts in each of the priority areas led multi-agency teams in developing chapters on each of the priority areas. They compiled past successes, documented future plans, and critically examined the potential approaches to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. This resulted in a list of proven strategies that any organization can use to develop their own traffic safety plans.

The strong partnerships among safety agencies in Washington State did not happen overnight. They have been fostered and strengthened over a decade of conscious effort. The SHSP update process in Washington State allows a great array of safety partners with diverse perspectives to come together to have strategic discussions based on a common set of data. Each update of Target Zero® has drawn more partners, which in turn has led to new ideas, changed attitudes and behaviors, and greater coordination of efforts.

Common Goals, Strategies and Measures

Target Zero® is coordinated with other plans, including the Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP), Highway Safety Plan (HSP), and the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP). Representatives from the agencies that steward these plans helped author the associated sections in Target Zero®.

Target Zero® sets common goals and safety strategies for State agencies and provides guidance to local agencies, nonprofit groups, and Tribes in Washington. The priorities identified in Target Zero® are guided by several factors including: the Governor's priorities as expressed in the Washington Transportation Plan, a careful review of traffic safety data and analysis, and input from partners. Target Zero® is intended to be incorporated into the plans and programs of key state traffic safety agencies, as well as other state agencies, Tribes, cities, counties, and private organizations. State agencies are required to integrate Target Zero® into their strategies and plans and it is strongly recommended for all law enforcement, engineering organizations, and any organization involved in traffic safety.

Federally funded programs administered by Washington State agencies set forth criteria to align the priorities and strategies identified in Target Zero®. WTSC also funds Target Zero® managers in local communities who are embedded in public agencies to facilitate traffic safety mobilizations, and implement and support proven Target Zero® strategies. This helps WTSC develop local partnerships and facilitate the implementation of proven safety strategies in key locations statewide.

Tribal Integration

The Steering Committee, which included Tribal representation, has made particular efforts to reach out to the 29 Federally Recognized Tribes located within the borders of Washington State for the Target Zero® update. In 2012, 12 Tribal members representing six Washington Tribes, participated in the partners' meeting and met for a special luncheon that day. Tribal representatives were invaluable in drafting the “Native American Tribes and Target Zero®” chapter of the Plan.

However, on an ongoing basis, Tribal and state representatives meet regularly to discuss transportation and traffic safety concerns. This sharing occurs at meetings of the Tribal Transportation Planning Organization and the Washington Indian Transportation Policy Advisory Committee. Tribes also actively participate on a Tribal Traffic Safety Advisory Board with the WTSC.

Key Accomplishments

  • Incorporated input from approximately 180 partners
  • Built strong safety partnerships with state, local, Tribal, and nonprofit agencies throughout the State
  • Incorporated input from Tribal representatives on safety strategies for reservation roadways
  • Set common data-driven goals and proven safety strategies for State, local, and Tribal agencies

See these other SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices:

Contact

Darrin Grondel
Washington Traffic Safety Commission
(360) 725-9899
DGrondel@wtsc.wa.gov

Idaho Integrates its SHSP with Other State Plans and Programs

The Idaho practice is discussed after the following introduction about SHSP integration.

Other states in this SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices series: DE, ME, MD, ND, WA


Introduction to SHSP Integration

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is a statewide-coordinated safety plan that provides a comprehensive framework for reducing the number of deaths and serious injuries on all public roads. In each State, the SHSP identifies the State's safety goals, objectives and key emphasis areas. It is intended to serve as an ‘umbrella’ plan that is integrated into other State transportation plans and guides the State's roadway safety investment decisions.

Integration Defined

Integration is the act of bringing together or incorporating various parts into a whole. Integration is relevant and important to a State's planning process because every State has numerous transportation plans; each one potentially addressing safety in a different way. The SHSP is the mechanism to bring these safety “parts” together to form a consistent and “whole” safety program for the State.

The Purpose and Benefits of Integration

The purpose of integration is to coordinate and focus the State's roadway safety efforts to maximize the State's ability to save lives.

Through integration, the safety needs of the State can be addressed more strategically and resources can be shared more effectively. As illustrated in Figure 1, integration encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly to save lives.

"Image shows three boxes pointing to one circle. The three boxes are above the circle. From right to left, the boxes read:  'Collective Action,' 'Common Goal(s),' and 'Leveraged Resources.' The circle reads 'Lives Saved.' The figure represents an integration process that encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly, to save lives."

Other potential integration benefits include:

  • The use of consistent data and analysis methods.
  • Improved allocation of resources to more effectively produce safety improvements.
  • Improvements to safety culture across State, regional, and local agencies.
  • A reduction in the administrative burden on States and local agencies.

Integration of Plans and Processes

State transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans. The relationship of these plans is illustrated in Figure 2.

"The image is a work flow that shows the various state transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with. These include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans."

An integrated SHSP positions the State DOT and its safety partners to collectively address the State's safety challenges on all public roads through coordination and consistency among with the following State and regional plans and programs:

  • LRTPs to promote a long-range vision that incorporates safety priorities.
  • HSIP projects to be consistent with the SHSP emphasis areas and strategies.
  • STIPS/TIPS to align programming of projects with SHSP strategies and countermeasures.
  • CVSPs to facilitate exchange and collaboration between the commercial motor vehicle safety community and the broader safety community.
  • HSPs to ensure a consistent, data-driven approach to improving highway safety, especially in SHSP emphasis areas.

In addition, the SHSP should integrate with city and county planning processes to ensure consideration of safety concerns on all road types.

SHSP Integration Indicators

Indicators that the SHSP and other transportation plans and processes are integrated include the following:

  • Other transportation plans incorporate elements of the SHSP and include consistent and supporting safety goals, performance measures, objectives, and strategies.
  • The priorities and goals of other transportation programs and plans are considered when developing the SHSP.
  • Safety partners have access to and use of common safety data, analysis, and methods for determining safety priorities.
  • The SHSP is developed with sustained input from disciplines and agencies representing the 4Es of safety (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency medical services).
  • Safety partners assist in the implementation of SHSP strategies.
  • SHSP stakeholders and experts are included in other transportation planning processes.
  • SHSP priorities and strategies are considered in project prioritization and programming.
  • Various sources of funding are used to achieve safety goals.
  • Progress towards safety goals is measured jointly and regularly.

Idaho

Background

The Idaho Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) incorporates the input of numerous safety partners and is closely integrated with other State traffic safety plans. Idaho's SHSP brings partners together from across the State to address Idaho's most significant issues to improve safety and reduce traffic deaths and serious injuries.

SHSP Integration Strategies

Collaborative Development

The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) developed the SHSP through a collaborative process with multiple safety partners with the explicit purpose of strengthening safety partnerships, supporting safety coalitions, sharing data, knowledge and resources, avoiding redundant activities, and leveraging existing resources. The ITD partnered with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety to host an SHSP Workshop and Peer Exchange in 2009. More than 100 professionals representing engineering, education, enforcement, and emergency response agencies participated in the event. Following this peer exchange, ITD developed an SHSP that establishes emphasis areas based on the economic costs of crashes, sets strategies across the 4Es, and clearly identifies lead roles and responsibilities for safety agencies across the State.

Coordinated Implementation

Implementation of the Idaho SHSP is guided by an oversight team that meets on a quarterly basis and consists of representatives from the ITD, the Idaho Trauma Registry, FHWA, the Idaho State Police, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). ITD has developed an action steps tracking document, which includes information about the responsible party, funding, and activity status, to help monitor implementation of the SHSP.

ITD has established a sustained process for developing and implementing the SHSP through emphasis area teams led by partner safety agencies. Emphasis area teams have been established to lead the implementation of strategies in specific emphasis areas. Emphasis area team leads include representatives from local and state police departments, advocacy groups, and other highway safety partners. An ITD Highway Safety Program Manager and Research Analyst is a member of the respective emphasis area teams to act as a resource and liaison, but not to act as the chairman of the emphasis team. Each emphasis area team has defined performance measures, which were either agreed on by the SHSP oversight team or adopted from other relevant plans. The emphasis team leads report to the oversight team every six months.

Common Goals, Strategies, and Measures

The Highway Safety Office of the ITD is responsible for the SHSP, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (FHWA), and the Idaho Highway Safety Plan (NHTSA). This allows an integrated approach for safety planning and implementation to take place under one organizational structure for both the behavior and infrastructure programs. The Idaho SHSP places an emphasis on both infrastructure and behavioral factors in roadway crashes and is closely tied to the Idaho HSP. The strategies and projects listed in the HSP are explicitly aligned to strategies described in the SHSP emphasis areas. In addition, the SHSP includes a “Commercial Motor Vehicles” emphasis area that is led by a representative from Idaho State Police Commercial Vehicle Services and is closely tied to the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP). The close alignment of the SHSP, HSP, and CVSP ensures that funding and implementation strategies are closely coordinated across State agencies.

Outreach and Communication

ITD uses the SHSP to reach out to other State and local agencies within Idaho to coordinate safety efforts. ITD has developed brochures and talking points summarizing emphasis area crash data and SHSP strategies. In addition, ITD provides breakdowns of crash data by emphasis area for each of the six ITD districts. ITD uses these materials to conduct outreach with potential safety partners, including MPOs, local agencies, and advocacy organizations.

Key Accomplishments

  • Incorporates input from diverse array of partners representing 4Es
  • Assigns leadership roles for implementing SHSP to partners and tracks implementation of strategies
  • Closely aligns SHSP with Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP) and Highway Safety Plan (HSP)

See these other SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices:

Contact

Brent Jennings, P.E.
Idaho Transportation Department
(208) 334-8557
Brent.Jennings@itd.idaho.gov

Maine Integrates its SHSP with Other State Plans and Programs

The Maine practice is discussed after the following introduction about SHSP integration.

Other states in this SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices series: DE, ID, MD, ND, WA


Introduction to SHSP Integration

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is a statewide-coordinated safety plan that provides a comprehensive framework for reducing the number of deaths and serious injuries on all public roads. In each State, the SHSP identifies the State's safety goals, objectives and key emphasis areas. It is intended to serve as an ‘umbrella’ plan that is integrated into other State transportation plans and guides the State's roadway safety investment decisions.

Integration Defined

Integration is the act of bringing together or incorporating various parts into a whole. Integration is relevant and important to a State's planning process because every State has numerous transportation plans; each one potentially addressing safety in a different way. The SHSP is the mechanism to bring these safety “parts” together to form a consistent and “whole” safety program for the State.

The Purpose and Benefits of Integration

The purpose of integration is to coordinate and focus the State's roadway safety efforts to maximize the State's ability to save lives.

Through integration, the safety needs of the State can be addressed more strategically and resources can be shared more effectively. As illustrated in Figure 1, integration encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly to save lives.

"Image shows three boxes pointing to one circle. The three boxes are above the circle. From right to left, the boxes read:  'Collective Action,' 'Common Goal(s),' and 'Leveraged Resources.' The circle reads 'Lives Saved.' The figure represents an integration process that encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly, to save lives."

Other potential integration benefits include:

  • The use of consistent data and analysis methods.
  • Improved allocation of resources to more effectively produce safety improvements.
  • Improvements to safety culture across State, regional, and local agencies.
  • A reduction in the administrative burden on States and local agencies.

Integration of Plans and Processes

State transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans. The relationship of these plans is illustrated in Figure 2.

"The image is a work flow that shows the various state transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with. These include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans."

An integrated SHSP positions the State DOT and its safety partners to collectively address the State's safety challenges on all public roads through coordination and consistency among with the following State and regional plans and programs:

  • LRTPs to promote a long-range vision that incorporates safety priorities.
  • HSIP projects to be consistent with the SHSP emphasis areas and strategies.
  • STIPS/TIPS to align programming of projects with SHSP strategies and countermeasures.
  • CVSPs to facilitate exchange and collaboration between the commercial motor vehicle safety community and the broader safety community.
  • HSPs to ensure a consistent, data-driven approach to improving highway safety, especially in SHSP emphasis areas.

In addition, the SHSP should integrate with city and county planning processes to ensure consideration of safety concerns on all road types.

SHSP Integration Indicators

Indicators that the SHSP and other transportation plans and processes are integrated include the following:

  • Other transportation plans incorporate elements of the SHSP and include consistent and supporting safety goals, performance measures, objectives, and strategies.
  • The priorities and goals of other transportation programs and plans are considered when developing the SHSP.
  • Safety partners have access to and use of common safety data, analysis, and methods for determining safety priorities.
  • The SHSP is developed with sustained input from disciplines and agencies representing the 4Es of safety (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency medical services).
  • Safety partners assist in the implementation of SHSP strategies.
  • SHSP stakeholders and experts are included in other transportation planning processes.
  • SHSP priorities and strategies are considered in project prioritization and programming.
  • Various sources of funding are used to achieve safety goals.
  • Progress towards safety goals is measured jointly and regularly.

Maine

Background

The Maine SHSP brings together many state agencies pursuing traffic safety interests plus other safety advocates. Together they address Maine's leading traffic safety concerns in a coordinated way to maximize effectiveness and efficiency of achieving improvements in target areas.

SHSP Integration Practices

Collaborative Development

The Maine Department of Transportation (DOT) and Department of Public Safety's Bureau of Highway Safety (BHS) led an update of the SHSP in 2012. The 2012 SHSP identifies eight lead focus areas and six additional strategic areas. Champions from State, local and nonprofit agencies are identified for each of the 14 focus areas. A particular emphasis was placed on identifying local law enforcement champions to encourage local engagement in the plan. Champions are responsible for regularly convening working groups, reviewing data, and developing objectives and strategies, leading the implementation of strategies, and reporting progress. Strategies to bring about safety improvement include Engineering, Enforcement, Education/Public Outreach, and Emergency Services.

Common Goals, Strategies, and Measures

Maine's SHSP is closely tied to the Highway Safety Plan (HSP). The BHS and Maine DOT's Office of Safety work closely together to ensure that their efforts are coordinated. As a result, the goals expressed in the SHSP and HSP are common goals arrived at from reviewing the same data. Performance measures and targets included in the SHSP for behavioral emphasis areas are drawn from those defined in the HSP.

Coordinated Implementation

The Maine Transportation Safety Coalition (MTSC) provides another channel for coordinating safety efforts. Members of the coalition meet monthly to review data and coordinate efforts towards common goals. The MTSC helps to promote and integrate SHSP goals and strategies across the Maine safety community. The MTSC also helps to ensure that the major safety agencies in Maine are all communicating the same message about highway safety.

Outreach and Communication

The partnerships among Maine's safety agencies are reinforced through consistent communication and collaboration. Individuals in key safety agencies have made the effort to build personal relationships over time. Mechanisms like the SHSP update, the implementation process and the MTSC help to reinforce those personal relationships that are vital for ensuring that safety efforts are coordinated throughout the State.

Key Accomplishments

  • Identified champions from State, local, and nonprofit agencies to lead emphasis area strategy development and implementation
  • Closely aligned goals and performance measures in the SHSP with those in the Highway Safety Plan (HSP)
  • Promoted the SHSP through the Maine Transportation Safety Coalition

See these other SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices:

Contact

Duane Brunell
Maine Department of Transportation
(207) 624-3278
Duane.Brunell@maine.gov

Maryland Integrates its SHSP with Other State Plans and Programs

The Maryland practice is discussed after the following introduction about SHSP integration.

Other states in this SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices series: DE, ID, ME, ND, WA


Introduction to SHSP Integration

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is a statewide-coordinated safety plan that provides a comprehensive framework for reducing the number of deaths and serious injuries on all public roads. In each State, the SHSP identifies the State's safety goals, objectives and key emphasis areas. It is intended to serve as an ‘umbrella’ plan that is integrated into other State transportation plans and guides the State's roadway safety investment decisions.

Integration Defined

Integration is the act of bringing together or incorporating various parts into a whole. Integration is relevant and important to a State's planning process because every State has numerous transportation plans; each one potentially addressing safety in a different way. The SHSP is the mechanism to bring these safety “parts” together to form a consistent and “whole” safety program for the State.

The Purpose and Benefits of Integration

The purpose of integration is to coordinate and focus the State's roadway safety efforts to maximize the State's ability to save lives.

Through integration, the safety needs of the State can be addressed more strategically and resources can be shared more effectively. As illustrated in Figure 1, integration encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly to save lives.

"Image shows three boxes pointing to one circle. The three boxes are above the circle. From right to left, the boxes read:  'Collective Action,' 'Common Goal(s),' and 'Leveraged Resources.' The circle reads 'Lives Saved.' The figure represents an integration process that encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly, to save lives."

Other potential integration benefits include:

  • The use of consistent data and analysis methods.
  • Improved allocation of resources to more effectively produce safety improvements.
  • Improvements to safety culture across State, regional, and local agencies.
  • A reduction in the administrative burden on States and local agencies.

Integration of Plans and Processes

State transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans. The relationship of these plans is illustrated in Figure 2.

"The image is a work flow that shows the various state transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with. These include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans."

An integrated SHSP positions the State DOT and its safety partners to collectively address the State's safety challenges on all public roads through coordination and consistency among with the following State and regional plans and programs:

  • LRTPs to promote a long-range vision that incorporates safety priorities.
  • HSIP projects to be consistent with the SHSP emphasis areas and strategies.
  • STIPS/TIPS to align programming of projects with SHSP strategies and countermeasures.
  • CVSPs to facilitate exchange and collaboration between the commercial motor vehicle safety community and the broader safety community.
  • HSPs to ensure a consistent, data-driven approach to improving highway safety, especially in SHSP emphasis areas.

In addition, the SHSP should integrate with city and county planning processes to ensure consideration of safety concerns on all road types.

SHSP Integration Indicators

Indicators that the SHSP and other transportation plans and processes are integrated include the following:

  • Other transportation plans incorporate elements of the SHSP and include consistent and supporting safety goals, performance measures, objectives, and strategies.
  • The priorities and goals of other transportation programs and plans are considered when developing the SHSP.
  • Safety partners have access to and use of common safety data, analysis, and methods for determining safety priorities.
  • The SHSP is developed with sustained input from disciplines and agencies representing the 4Es of safety (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency medical services).
  • Safety partners assist in the implementation of SHSP strategies.
  • SHSP stakeholders and experts are included in other transportation planning processes.
  • SHSP priorities and strategies are considered in project prioritization and programming.
  • Various sources of funding are used to achieve safety goals.
  • Progress towards safety goals is measured jointly and regularly.

Maryland

Background

The overall objective of Maryland's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is to reduce fatalities and Injuries. Maryland has adopted the vision of Towards Zero Death, with an overarching goal to halve fatalities in Maryland by 2030, and to 475 by 2015.

The SHSP is housed in the Highway Safety Office (HSO) under the direction and oversight of the highway safety coordinator. An Executive Council meets quarterly to receive SHSP updates, provide direction, review successes and discuss challenges. The Council is comprised of Maryland's: Secretary of the State Police; Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) Administrator; State Highway Administration (SHA) Administrator; Deputy Secretary of the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH); Department of Transportation's (MDOT) Director of Planning; Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS) Executive Director; and Transportation Authority Police.

SHSP Integration Practices

Common Goals, Strategies and Measures

The SHSP serves as the long-term, overarching highway safety plan for the State. It directs the priorities and strategies addressed by the State's other highway safety related plans and programs, including the Highway Safety Plan (HSP), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP).

"The image displays Maryland's SHSP integration model. The image shows that the SHSP is informed by Highway Safety Plan (from the Maryland Highway Safety Office), the Highway Safety Improvement Program (from the State Highway Administration), and the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan. The image also displays additional contributors to the SHSP: metropolitan planning organization, Maryland Department of Transportation, and local strategic plans."

The SHSP establishes broad strategies for the State. They are further defined into action steps that are developed by the SHSP emphasis area teams. These action steps form a selection of the projects outlined in the annual HSP, HSIP and CVSP. Keeping the strategies broad in nature allows a wide-range of buy-in from partners and an opportunity for all 4Es to participate as appropriate for their agencies.

Several key partners have committed their support for the SHSP through resolutions. The Maryland Chiefs of Police, Sheriff's Association, Association of County Health Officials, and the Institute for EMS Systems have all signed resolutions pledging their support to Maryland's Towards Zero Death vision, the SHSP, and helping to implement the SHSP strategies.

“The SHSP guides our overarching highway safety goals and efforts. The HSP, HSIP, CVSP and our other annual safety plans are where the rubber meets the road.”

- Thomas J. Gianni, Chief
Maryland Highway Safety Office

To achieve a fifty percent reduction in fatalities by 2030, a geometric mean reduction plan was devised to work backward from Maryland's future goal using 2008 as the benchmark year. This methodology was also used to set interim annual targets and various performance measures for the HSP & State Highway Administration Business Plans. In the future, Maryland will establish program area performance measures based on a rolling average, but the current methodology to set interim annual targets for the plans will remain the same.

Maryland has spent a great deal of effort elevating the SHSP in the eyes of the entire Department of Transportation. In prior years, the safety elements in the DOT's Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan and the Motor Vehicle Association's long range plan were not in line with the SHSP. Now the SHSP sets the tone and goals for these plans and the plans refer back to the SHSP. This is true for other State agency plans as well. For example, the Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene and the Maryland State Police both have agency business plans with highway safety components. These safety components align with those in the SHSP. A big factor in accomplishing this is having the leadership from these agencies as members of the SHSP Executive Council.

Local Integration

Maryland is embarking in an effort to develop county roadway safety plans. The idea is to have local level plans that align with the SHSP, but with refined emphasis areas and strategies that have a local “flavor.” The State Highway Administration is taking the lead and is developing local data packages for counties.

For example, Hartford County has already developed a local SHSP and has set the stage for other county efforts. Like the state's SHSP, the Harford County SHSP follows a data driven, multidisciplinary approach involving the 4Es of traffic safety—education, emergency medical services, enforcement, and engineering. The plan provides a framework for reducing fatalities and serious injuries on all Harford County roads, and it establishes goals, objectives, and key emphasis areas in keeping with the goals and objectives of the SHSP. It also focuses on all road users to include bicyclists, drivers, motorcycle riders, and pedestrians.

Harford County will join Maryland in adopting the goal of the national initiative Toward Zero Deaths to reduce traffic fatalities by half by 2030. Harford County also used the same methodology as the state's SHSP to establish a benchmark for progress and will follow interim goals for fatality and injury reductions by 2015.

Key Accomplishments

  • Broad SHSP strategies to help engage partners
  • SHSP goals and strategies integrated with other State plans
  • Coordinated target setting
  • County SHSPs to help implement SHSP strategies at the local level

See these other SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices:

Contact

Thomas J. Gianni
Maryland Highway Safety Office
(410) 787-4014
TGianni@mdot.state.md.us