USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Noteworthy Practices

North Dakota Integrates its SHSP with Other State Plans and Programs

The North Dakota practice is discussed after the following introduction about SHSP integration.

Other states in this SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices series: DE, ID, ME, MD, WA


Introduction to SHSP Integration

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is a statewide-coordinated safety plan that provides a comprehensive framework for reducing the number of deaths and serious injuries on all public roads. In each State, the SHSP identifies the State's safety goals, objectives and key emphasis areas. It is intended to serve as an ‘umbrella’ plan that is integrated into other State transportation plans and guides the State's roadway safety investment decisions.

Integration Defined

Integration is the act of bringing together or incorporating various parts into a whole. Integration is relevant and important to a State's planning process because every State has numerous transportation plans; each one potentially addressing safety in a different way. The SHSP is the mechanism to bring these safety “parts” together to form a consistent and “whole” safety program for the State.

The Purpose and Benefits of Integration

The purpose of integration is to coordinate and focus the State's roadway safety efforts to maximize the State's ability to save lives.

Through integration, the safety needs of the State can be addressed more strategically and resources can be shared more effectively. As illustrated in Figure 1, integration encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly to save lives.

"Image shows three boxes pointing to one circle. The three boxes are above the circle. From right to left, the boxes read:  'Collective Action,' 'Common Goal(s),' and 'Leveraged Resources.' The circle reads 'Lives Saved.' The figure represents an integration process that encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly, to save lives."

Other potential integration benefits include:

  • The use of consistent data and analysis methods.
  • Improved allocation of resources to more effectively produce safety improvements.
  • Improvements to safety culture across State, regional, and local agencies.
  • A reduction in the administrative burden on States and local agencies.

Integration of Plans and Processes

State transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans. The relationship of these plans is illustrated in Figure 2.

"The image is a work flow that shows the various state transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with. These include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans."

An integrated SHSP positions the State DOT and its safety partners to collectively address the State's safety challenges on all public roads through coordination and consistency among with the following State and regional plans and programs:

  • LRTPs to promote a long-range vision that incorporates safety priorities.
  • HSIP projects to be consistent with the SHSP emphasis areas and strategies.
  • STIPS/TIPS to align programming of projects with SHSP strategies and countermeasures.
  • CVSPs to facilitate exchange and collaboration between the commercial motor vehicle safety community and the broader safety community.
  • HSPs to ensure a consistent, data-driven approach to improving highway safety, especially in SHSP emphasis areas.

In addition, the SHSP should integrate with city and county planning processes to ensure consideration of safety concerns on all road types.

SHSP Integration Indicators

Indicators that the SHSP and other transportation plans and processes are integrated include the following:

  • Other transportation plans incorporate elements of the SHSP and include consistent and supporting safety goals, performance measures, objectives, and strategies.
  • The priorities and goals of other transportation programs and plans are considered when developing the SHSP.
  • Safety partners have access to and use of common safety data, analysis, and methods for determining safety priorities.
  • The SHSP is developed with sustained input from disciplines and agencies representing the 4Es of safety (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency medical services).
  • Safety partners assist in the implementation of SHSP strategies.
  • SHSP stakeholders and experts are included in other transportation planning processes.
  • SHSP priorities and strategies are considered in project prioritization and programming.
  • Various sources of funding are used to achieve safety goals.
  • Progress towards safety goals is measured jointly and regularly.

North Dakota

Background

The North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT) Safety Division is responsible for coordinating the development and implementation of the State's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). North Dakota recently updated the SHSP using a collaborative process that included a wide range of safety stakeholders including Federal, State, local, and private sector entities. The SHSP provides an overview of traffic safety issues and trends, goals, emphasis areas, initiatives, programs, and achievements to promote traffic safety in North Dakota.

SHSP Integration Practices

Collaborative Development

Through the SHSP, the North Dakota DOT promotes coordination with other traffic safety partners and initiatives throughout the state. The SHSP process has led to closer coordination among safety agencies. With each update, NDDOT has increased the number of stakeholders involved in the process.

The 2013 North Dakota SHSP update was led by the leadership of the NDDOT, in consultation with safety partners across the state who worked collaboratively towards their overall goal of eliminating all traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all North Dakota roads. At the onset, the SHSP was developed under the guidance of a steering committee consisting of representatives from NDDOT, the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Emergency Medical Services and Trauma, the North Dakota Highway Patrol, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). To further incorporate stakeholder input into the SHSP, NDDOT invited about 100 4E stakeholders representing education, enforcement, engineering, and EMS from across the State to a workshop where they reviewed State safety data and identified strategies for implementation.

In addition to reviewing data, the SHSP steering committee also referred to associated safety plans and programs including the Traffic Records Strategic Plan and the Highway Safety Plan (HSP). The SHSP Steering Committee took part in the HSP data analysis and planning functions as well.

The NDDOT Safety Division is responsible for developing both the SHSP and the HSP. As a result, the SHSP and HSP are closely aligned. Strategies in the HSP are consistent with the SHSP priority emphasis areas and evidence-based strategies. In fact, the completed SHSP was used as a basis for selecting strategies for inclusion in the current HSP. The link between the SHSP and HSP strategies and projects can be seen in the following example from the Alcohol-Related Emphasis Area.

The NDDOT Programming Division is responsible for developing and implementing the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The Programming Division served on the SHSP steering committee and actively participated in the 2013 North Dakota SHSP update. The NDDOT HSIP uses a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads. The NDDOT ensures the HSIP projects are consistent with the data-driven SHSP. This is easily accomplished due to the close coordination between the Programming Division, Safety Division and local partners.

"The image contains two boxes. The top box is the SHSP strategy for DUI. The bottom box is the HSP strategy for DUI. The image shows that the SHSP and HSP are closely aligned. Strategies in the HSP are consistent with the SHSP priority emphasis areas and evidence-based strategies."

Consensus Safety Goal

North Dakota has established a long-term goal to eliminate all traffic fatalities on North Dakota's public roads. While it is widely recognized within the state that there is only one suitable long-term goal, it is also acknowledged that intermediate (short-term) goals are needed as benchmarks to measure progress. Intermediate goals also promote cooperation among agencies to accomplish these goals. Discussions were held with safety stakeholders to begin the process of selecting an intermediate goal. Due to the upward trend of traffic fatalities, there was unanimous support for an aggressive intermediate goal to reduce traffic fatalities, and several options were discussed. After considering the stakeholders' input, the SHSP Steering Committee selected reducing the 3-year average of traffic fatalities to 100 or fewer by 2020 (approximately a 3 percent reduction per year).

SHSP Implementation

North Dakota acknowledges that the development of a data-driven SHSP and adopting crash reduction goals is only the first step. Plans do not save lives, implementation does. To reverse the current trend and achieve the crash reduction goal, North Dakota commits to a comprehensive statewide highway safety program with implementation of high priority safety strategies along roadway systems and facilities defined to be at-risk. The basic components of this comprehensive program are working with the safety partners to implement the driver-behavior program, implement infrastructure improvements, improve emergency response, and improve reporting of crashes.

Local and Tribal Integration

The NDDOT made specific efforts to reach out to the Tribes within North Dakota to include them as SHSP stakeholders. Tribal traffic safety coordinators and law enforcement officials were included as part of the SHSP development process. This partnership with tribal stakeholders also included efforts to collect and share safety data and data analysis.

To ensure the implementation of the SHSP at the local level, NDDOT has led the development of local road safety plans. They intend to develop local road safety plans for all 53 counties, 12 major cities, and 4 tribes in North Dakota. As part of the process, they will collect and analyze safety data, hold formal regional workshops to select countermeasures, and document high risk local road locations and safety projects for implementation. The local road safety plans will help NDDOT carry out SHSP strategies at a local level by identifying data-driven safety projects on local roads for HSIP and HSP funding.

Key Accomplishments

  • Incorporated stakeholder input into the SHSP from about 100 stakeholders
  • Closely aligned SHSP, Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Highway Safety Plan (HSP)
  • Developing local road safety plans for each county and major city in North Dakota

See these other SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices:

Contact

Mark Nelson
North Dakota Department of Transportation
(701) 328-4559
MNelson@nd.gov

Delaware Integrates its SHSP with Other State Plans and Programs

The Delaware practice is discussed after the following introduction about SHSP integration.

Other states in this SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices series: ID, ME, MD, ND, WA


Introduction to SHSP Integration

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is a statewide-coordinated safety plan that provides a comprehensive framework for reducing the number of deaths and serious injuries on all public roads. In each State, the SHSP identifies the State's safety goals, objectives and key emphasis areas. It is intended to serve as an ‘umbrella’ plan that is integrated into other State transportation plans and guides the State's roadway safety investment decisions.

Integration Defined

Integration is the act of bringing together or incorporating various parts into a whole. Integration is relevant and important to a State's planning process because every State has numerous transportation plans; each one potentially addressing safety in a different way. The SHSP is the mechanism to bring these safety “parts” together to form a consistent and “whole” safety program for the State.

The Purpose and Benefits of Integration

The purpose of integration is to coordinate and focus the State's roadway safety efforts to maximize the State's ability to save lives.

Through integration, the safety needs of the State can be addressed more strategically and resources can be shared more effectively. As illustrated in Figure 1, integration encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly to save lives.

"Image shows three boxes pointing to one circle. The three boxes are above the circle. From right to left, the boxes read:  'Collective Action,' 'Common Goal(s),' and 'Leveraged Resources.' The circle reads 'Lives Saved.' The figure represents an integration process that encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly, to save lives."

Other potential integration benefits include:

  • The use of consistent data and analysis methods.
  • Improved allocation of resources to more effectively produce safety improvements.
  • Improvements to safety culture across State, regional, and local agencies.
  • A reduction in the administrative burden on States and local agencies.

Integration of Plans and Processes

State transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans. The relationship of these plans is illustrated in Figure 2.

"The image is a work flow that shows the various state transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with. These include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans."

An integrated SHSP positions the State DOT and its safety partners to collectively address the State's safety challenges on all public roads through coordination and consistency among with the following State and regional plans and programs:

  • LRTPs to promote a long-range vision that incorporates safety priorities.
  • HSIP projects to be consistent with the SHSP emphasis areas and strategies.
  • STIPS/TIPS to align programming of projects with SHSP strategies and countermeasures.
  • CVSPs to facilitate exchange and collaboration between the commercial motor vehicle safety community and the broader safety community.
  • HSPs to ensure a consistent, data-driven approach to improving highway safety, especially in SHSP emphasis areas.

In addition, the SHSP should integrate with city and county planning processes to ensure consideration of safety concerns on all road types.

SHSP Integration Indicators

Indicators that the SHSP and other transportation plans and processes are integrated include the following:

  • Other transportation plans incorporate elements of the SHSP and include consistent and supporting safety goals, performance measures, objectives, and strategies.
  • The priorities and goals of other transportation programs and plans are considered when developing the SHSP.
  • Safety partners have access to and use of common safety data, analysis, and methods for determining safety priorities.
  • The SHSP is developed with sustained input from disciplines and agencies representing the 4Es of safety (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency medical services).
  • Safety partners assist in the implementation of SHSP strategies.
  • SHSP stakeholders and experts are included in other transportation planning processes.
  • SHSP priorities and strategies are considered in project prioritization and programming.
  • Various sources of funding are used to achieve safety goals.
  • Progress towards safety goals is measured jointly and regularly.

Delaware

Background

A core committee of coordinating agencies made up of Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), Delaware's Office of Highway Safety (OHS), the Delaware State Police (DSP), the Delaware Office of Emergency Medical Services (OEMS), and the Delaware Department of Justice led the update of the Delaware Strategic Highway Safety Plan in 2010. The committee closely coordinated with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) throughout the process.

SHSP Integration Practices

Collaborative SHSP Development and Implementation

The process of developing Delaware's 2010 SHSP update helped to strengthen existing partnerships across safety agencies in Delaware. Including all of the key State public safety agencies on the core committee responsible for updating the SHSP ensured that all of the agencies had a chance to review the same crash data, reach agreement about safety priorities in the State based on the crash data, and identify a robust set of multidisciplinary strategies to address each crash type. The inclusion of the OEMS on the core committee led to the identification of a number of new emergency response strategies being included in the 2010 update. The core coordinating agencies continue to work together on various safety initiatives and coordinate to ensure that the strategies identified in the SHSP are implemented. DelDOT also uses the SHSP as an outreach tool for talking to other public agencies within Delaware about the State's roadway safety priorities and strategies.

Coordinated Goals

The coordinating agencies reviewed fatal crash data as well as FHWA and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guidelines for SHSPs to select and prioritize the emphasis areas in accordance with the frequency of the associated crash type. In addition to emphasis areas based on crash types, the coordinating agencies added “Improving Traffic Records” as an emphasis area.

Although the national and statewide overall SHSP goals are based on fatality rates rather than fatal crash rates, Delaware's coordinating agencies agreed to base Delaware's data analyses and performance-based goals for each emphasis area on the number of fatal crashes rather than the number of fatalities for all data-driven emphasis areas, except for the emphasis area dedicated to Increasing Seat Belt Usage.

The SHSP established goals for each primary emphasis area based on a percent reduction in the number of fatal crashes and the corresponding reduction in the number of fatal crashes. Additionally, the group reviewed the goals in other Delaware safety plans including OHS's FY 2010 Highway Safety Plan (HSP), the Delaware Traffic Safety Information System Strategic Plan, and DSP's FY 2010 Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), to ensure that the goals of the SHSP were consistent with the goals of other statewide initiatives.

SHSP Strategies Reflected as Projects in Highway Safety Plan

The coordinating agencies selected education, enforcement, engineering, and emergency services strategies to address each emphasis area. Strategies were selected based on their cost-effectiveness, potential rate of return, and proven effectiveness.

SHSP strategies are reflected in other State plans, such as the HSP. For example, an SHSP emphasis area is “Increasing Seat Belt Usage.” The strategies in the SHSP involve educational and enforcement campaigns to inform the public of the safety benefits of wearing a seat belt. Enforcement and education strategies are reflected in Delaware's most recent HSP, as projects to provide funding to law enforcement agencies with an identified traffic safety problem to conduct enforcement blitzes focused on occupant protection violations. The enforcement includes both checkpoints and saturation patrols and is supported by paid media.

Coordination among the agencies has been particularly important for establishing and implementing strategies for “Improving Traffic Records.” The State Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC) is responsible for leading data improvement efforts in Delaware. The TRCC's Traffic Safety Information System Strategic Plan is referenced in the SHSP as well as the HSP as the guide to ensure that the proper steps are being taken to create data systems that are timely, accurate, consistent, complete, and accessible.

The SHSP outlines the projects and strategies to improve information and decision support systems that are in the TRCC's Strategic Plan, such as expansion of the Crash Analysis Reporting System (CARS) to support DelDOT's safety program, and a new EMS data system (Delaware Information Management for Emergency Services (DIMES). The HSP then specifies traffic records projects and the allocation of funds to activities such as:

  • E-crash enhancements
  • CARS enhancements
  • DIMES system for the Office Emergency Medical Services

Data projects like these have been instrumental in advancing Delaware's ability to utilize comprehensive traffic safety data when making resource allocation decisions.

Key Accomplishments

  • Committee of coordinating agencies instrumental in developing and implementing plan
  • Aligned goals and strategies in the SHSP, HSP and CVSP
  • Identified emergency services strategies to address each primary emphasis area
  • Identified roles and responsibilities for leading 4E strategies
  • Strengthened partnerships among State safety agencies

See these other SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices:

Contact

Adam Weiser
Delaware Department of Transportation
(302) 659-4073
Adam.Weiser@state.de.us

Safety Patrol Sponsor-Partnership

Original publication: National Roadway Safety Awards: Noteworthy Practices Guide; 2011


Description of Practice

With ongoing state fiscal crises reducing or eliminating funding for safety patrol programs, Travelers Marketing assisted seven states in securing sponsorship and forging partnerships with companies whose business interests and corporate missions align with the program's safety objectives.

Key Accomplishments and Results:

  • Innovative funding strategy to save what would have likely been a program cut due to funding struggles.
  • Program generated in excess of $30 million for the participating states of Florida, Pennsylvania, Georgia, New York, Maryland, Kansas, and Massachusetts.
  • Generated public awareness of roadway safety

"Two photograph: (1) A safety engineer standing beside his truck with the Florida Road Ranger logo and (2) A Road Ranger truck with a message board atop it and a safety engineer diverting traffic around one lane"

Contact

Samuel A. McClain
Travelers Marketing LLC
407-456-1917
smmclain@travelersmarketing.com

Idaho Uses Highway Safety Manual Methodology to Identify Priority Locations for Safety Improvements

Original publication: National Roadway Safety Awards: Noteworthy Practices Guide; 2013

Download latest Adobe® Reader


Description of Practice

To improve cost effectiveness in funding safety projects, Idaho Transportation Department used an innovative, data-driven program for safety analysis on roadways throughout the State. The project includes assessing 5 years of statewide crash records, diagnosing the priority locations to determine casual relationships between site characteristics and crash records, identifying recommended improvements, and conducting benefit-cost analysis to rank the recommended safety improvements.

Key Accomplishments and Results:

  • Utilization of the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology to identify the highest priority locations for safety improvements
  • List of ranked safety improvement projects reflecting the most effective use of funding for safety projects

"Map showing the priority corridor identified by the data"

Contact

Brent Jennings
Idaho Transportation Department Office of Highway Safety
208-334-8557
Brent.Jennings@itd.idaho.gov

FM 1960 Median Improvements Program

Original publication: National Roadway Safety Awards: Noteworthy Practices Guide; 2011


Description of Practice

FM 1960 thoroughfare has a daily traffic count of 65,000 vehicles, 50 cross streets, 36 signals, and a driveway density of almost 49 driveways per mile. The crash rate along the corridor had a crash rate 217 percent higher than the statewide average. The Texas Department of Transportation's FM 1960 Median Improvement Project set out to improve mobility and safety along this 8 mile stretch.

Key Accomplishments and Results:

  • Installation of raised-curb medians, channelized left-turn bays, signal improvements, and striping.
  • Reduction in conflict points
  • More efficient traffic operations
  • Law enforcement officials in the area believe the project will reduce crashes and help emergency vehicles reach their destinations along the corridor more quickly
  • Modeling indicates a reduction in travel time by 16 percent, delays by 40 percent, and number of stops by 45 percent

"Two photographs: (1) a street with the following features: raised curb median, a channelized left-turn bay, and striping; and (2) a street with the following features: raised curb median and a channelized left-turn bay"

Contact

Danny Perez
Texas Department of Transportation
713 802-5077
Danny.Perez@tx.dot.gov

Wright County Highway Roadway Safety Program

Original publication: National Roadway Safety Awards: Noteworthy Practices Guide; 2011


Description of Practice

As one of the fastest growing counties in the Nation and responsible for 520 miles of highways, Wright County initiated a number of safety programs and strategies to minimize injuries and fatalities.

Key Accomplishments and Results:

  • Utilization of pavement markings and signage, and ITS technologies such as intersection warning systems, curve warning system, and driver feedback speed limit signs.
  • Project contributed to a 34 percent reduction of fatal and serious injury crashes since 1997
  • Improved public awareness of roadway safety

Two photographs: (1) a single lane road that widens to two lanes at a left intersection and (2) a roadway marking vehicle painting a solid white line to delineate the travel lane and breakdown area"Photograph of a worker on a truck affixing a yellow caution sign ('Look For Traffic') to a pole"

Contact

Wayne A. Fingalson
Wright County Highway Department
763-682-7388
Wayne.Fingalson@xo.wright.mn.us

Minnesota County Road Safety Plans

Original publication: National Roadway Safety Awards: Noteworthy Practices Guide; 2011


Description of Practice

In order to meet Minnesota's Toward Zero Deaths goal, roadway safety at the local-level needed to be addressed. County highway departments in Minnesota didn't have the experience with carrying out system-wide crash analysis or linking crash causes with mitigation strategies at specific locations. The County Road Safety Plans (CRSP) Program was created by MnDOT to more effectively involved local highway agencies in the safety planning process and provide them with technical assistance needed to apply for State and Federal funding.

Key Accomplishments and Results:

  • Crash analysis and system-wide risk assessment of road and traffic characteristics for each county
  • Identification of low-cost, infrastructure-based safety project for specific at-risk locations on county roads
  • Project prioritization and training about the Highway Safety Improvement Program solicitation process
  • First set of 20 country road safety plans identified $70 million worth of projects with 90% focused on roadway departure crashes

"Two photographs of local highway agency meetings"

Contact

Sue Groth
Minnesota Department of Transportation
651-234-7004
Sue.Groth@state.mn.us

California's HSIP Application and Evaluation Tool for Local Roadways

Original publication: National Roadway Safety Awards: Noteworthy Practices Guide; 2011 (PDF, 1.1 MB)


Description of Practice

With roughly 10 percent of all roadway fatalities in the United States, California has a well-established process for identifying and constructing safety improvements. However, these processes did not capture the over 600 individual local agencies eligible for Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding.

Key Accomplishments and Results:

  • Tool to satisfy the long-term Caltrans objective of making data-driven safety decisions
  • User-friendly tool that makes fair and reliable statewide project selections following Federal guidelines for proven safety countermeasures.
  • Encourages local agencies to put a great emphasis on roadway safety through network analysis and low-cost safety projects.
  • Data-driven HSIP project selections at the local level

"Screenshot from the Division of Local Assistance section of the Caltrans website"

Contact

Ted Davini
California Department of Transportation
916-651-8256
Ted.Davini@dot.ca.gov

Making Roadways Safer for Motorcycles

Original publication: National Roadway Safety Awards: Noteworthy Practices Guide; 2011


Description of Practice

With help from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Florida DOT formed a motorcycle safety coalition and a Motorcycle Strategic Safety Plan. The safety coalition created a training DVD to call attention to common challenging road conditions including grates, potholes, ridges, steel plates, pavement markings, grooved surfaces, loose gravel, land changes, and drop-offs in work zones.

Key Accomplishments and Results:

  • Creation of a 10-minute training DVD
  • Identifying safety countermeasures through the Motorcycle Strategic Plan
  • Integration of motorcycle safety into strategic planning initiatives

"Two images: (1) the Ride Smart Florida logo and (2) a photograph of the members of the motorcycle safety coalition"

Contact

Marianne Trussell
Florida Department of Transportation
850-245-1504
Marianne.Trussell@dot.state.fl.us

Jones/Linn County Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Overlay With Safety Edge ℠

Original publication: National Roadway Safety Awards: Noteworthy Practices Guide; 2011


Description of Practice

An Iowa State University study found that a pavement edge drop-off may have been a contributing factor in approximately 18% of rural run-off-the-road crashes on paved roadways with unpaved shoulders. They also found that pavement edge drop-off-related crashes were twice as likely to result in fatalities as other crash types on similar roadways. Safety Edge℠ was installed on a 2.7 mile stretch of roadway which had been previously identified as a “High Risk Rural Road” and the agency evaluated the constructability, quality, and performance of the project.

Key Accomplishments and Results:

  • Installation of 6-inch unbonded Portland cement concrete (PCC) overlay placed of an existing 6-inch PCC pavement. Overlay included two 11-foot lanes with tied 2-foot shoulders plus a 9-inch wide, 30-degree sloped Safety Edge℠ in both eastbound and westbound directions.
  • Crash reduction factors indicate that the use of Safety Edge℠ has the potential to reduce crashes by 5.7 percent and may provide additional pavement edge stability improving overall pavement life.

"Two photographs: (1) a construction crew lays down a road surface with a Safety Edge and (2) the a finished road with a Safety Edge"

Contacts

Mike McClain
Jones County Secondary Roads Department
319-462-3785
engineer@co.jones.ia.us

Steve Gannon
Linn County Secondary Roads Department
319-892-6400
Steve.Gannon@linncounty.org