USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation
FHWA Highway Safety Programs

Introduction

Road Safety Audits/Assessments (RSAs) are a valuable tool used to evaluate road safety issues and to identify opportunities for improvement.  The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) defines an RSA as a “formal safety performance evaluation of an existing or future road or intersection by an independent, multidisciplinary team.”  RSAs can be used on any type of facility during any stage of the project development process.

Page iii photo. A man in a safety vest is shown examining a headwall.

RSAs examine roadway and roadside features that may pose potential safety issues.

Some element of safety is considered on every project.  However, sometimes conditions on or adjacent to Federal and Tribal lands merit a more detailed safety review.  For example, traffic volumes on a roadway may be higher than intended or may carry a higher percentage of trucks and other heavy vehicles due to unanticipated growth.  These conditions can divide a Tribal community or interject a set of complexities to an unfamiliar visitor.  RSAs examine these conditions in detail by pulling together a multidisciplinary team that looks at the issues from different perspectives – perspectives which are often not a part of a traditional safety review.  RSAs also consider safety from a human factors point of view which aims to answer the following questions: How and why are people reacting to the roadway conditions?  What do people sense and how do they react to those senses?  What are the associated risks with those elements?  The multidisciplinary team approach helps to answer these questions.  Interactions between all road users (e.g., pedestrians and motor vehicles, commuter traffic and recreational vehicle traffic, bicycles and motor vehicles, etc.) are investigated to determine potential risk and to identify programs and measures to help reduce those risks and create safer environments for all road users.

Partner Agencies

  • FHWA
  • Tribal Governments
  • Bureau of Indian Affairs
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • National Park Service
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • Bureau of Land Management
  • Department of Defense
  • Tennessee Valley Authority
  • Bureau of Land Reclamation
  • Tribal Technical Assistance Program

RSAs have proven to be a leading tool for improving safety on and along roadways.  As such, the use of RSAs continues to grow throughout the U.S.  A decade ago, few states had experience conducting RSAs; now each state has had some experience with the RSA process.  The success has led to FHWA including the RSA processas one of its nine “proven safety countermeasures.” Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) and Tribes are beginning to witness the benefits of conducting RSAs.  FHWA Federal Lands Highway (FLH) division offices have helped plan or conduct RSAs on facilities owned by the National Park Service (NPS), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service (FS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and several Tribes.  The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has included RSA findings in planning and programming documents.  Western Federal Lands Highway Division (WFLHD) has used RSAs in their project selection process.  Tribes such as the Tohono O’odham Nation have worked with State and local agencies to conduct RSAs and implement RSA findings.  However, while RSAs have secured a foothold with FLMAs and Tribes, more opportunities exist to promote RSAs as a tool to address safety on and adjacent to Federal and Tribal lands.  Some examples include introducing FLMAs and Tribes to the RSA process, initiating full-fledged programs within agencies, and incorporating RSAs into the planning process, thus promoting a more comprehensive approach to addressing safety.

Page iv photo. This image shows a two lane road passing through very rocky terrain.

RSAs on Federal or Tribal facilities may encounter unique geometric and roadside conditions with significant historical, cultural, and environmental constraints.

Conducting an RSA does not require a large investment of time or money.  RSAs require only a small percentage of the time and money needed for a typical roadway project. Furthermore, by gaining a better understanding of the safety implications of roadway and roadside features, RSAs can be used to prioritize locations with safety issues which help identify the best use for funding.  Other benefits include encouraging multidisciplinary collaboration beyond the RSA, which promotes a better understanding of road user needs and safety.

RSAs will help save lives and reduce injuries.  The success of RSAs has led to FHWA adopting the process as one of its nine “proven safety countermeasures.”  The success has been realized by many FLMAs and Tribes, which are planning and/or conducting a number of RSAs with various partners.

Perhaps the best way to describe the effectiveness of RSAs is through a benefit/cost (B/C) ratio.  A benefit/cost ratio is a measure to compare the benefits derived from the reduction of crashes to the cost of conducting an RSA and implementing crash reduction strategies.  Benefit/cost ratios may be used as the ultimate measure of the project’s success.  The following case studies show the potential benefits of conducting RSAs.

RSA Success Stories

Roadway
An RSA was conducted along a 3.84-mile section of a two-lane road in Cumberland County, Tennessee.  Safety issues observed by the RSA team along the corridor included severe roadway curvature and limited sight distance.  The team suggested the following measures: install curve warning and chevron signs, paint thicker (8”) edgelines, and remove trees along the roadway.

  • RSA Cost = $12,000
  • Crash Reduction = 3.5%
  • Implementation Cost = $23,000
  • B/C Ratio = 20:1 (entire segment)
Page v photo. This image shows a section of roadway crossing a culvert.

Intersection
An RSA was conducted at a signalized and an unsignalized intersection in Collier County, Florida.  The potential safety issues included limited sight distance, faded and insufficient signing and markings, and lack of safe pedestrian facilities.  Team suggestions included trimming vegetation, installing advance warning signs, constructing left-turn lanes, and providing pedestrian signal and sidewalk improvements.

  • RSA Cost = $15,000
  • Crash Reduction = 9.5%
  • Implementation Cost = $250,000
  • B/C Ratio = 8:1 (both intersections)
Page v second photo. Image shows a car rounding a curve where trees obstruct the sight distance.

 

This Toolkit is intended to be used by Federal land agencies and Tribal governments as guidance and to provide information, ideas, and resources in key topic areas to lead the effort to improve safety through the use of the RSA:

  • How do I conduct an RSA?
  • What are common safety issues and potential countermeasures?
  • How do I establish an RSA program?
  • How do I incorporate RSAs in the planning process?
  • What’s next?

The Toolkit serves as a starting point, providing information to FLMAs and Tribes about identifying an RSA champion, partnerships needed to build support, available funding sources (for both the program and improvements), tools to conduct RSAs, and resources to identify safety issues and select countermeasures.  Worksheets and other sample materials have been provided to aid in the RSA process, including requesting assistance, scheduling, analyzing data, conducting field reviews, and documenting issues and suggestions.  Examples of programs and experiences of other agencies have also been included throughout to provide examples of successes and struggles in implementing RSAs and improving safety for all road users.

 



List of Terms

Term Definition
“4 E’s” Engineering, Education, Enforcement, and Emergency Medical Services
ADOT Arizona Department of Transportation
B/C Benefit/Cost
BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs
BLM Bureau of Land Management
CCP Comprehensive Conservation Plan
CFLHD Central Federal Lands Highway Division
COG Council of Governments
DOI United States Department of the Interior
DOT Department of Transportation
EFLHD Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division
EMS Emergency Medical Services
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FLH Federal Lands Highway
FLMA Federal Land Management Agency
FS United States Forest Service
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
GMP General Management Plan
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
IHS Indian Health Service
IRR Indian Reservation Roads Program
ITCA Inter Tribal Council of Arizona
LTAP Local Technical Assistance Program
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program
NEPA National Environmental Protection Agency
NPS National Park Service
NRDOT Navajo Region Division of Transportation
PLHD Public Land Highway Discretionary Program
RFP Request for Proposal
RPC Regional Planning Commission
RSA Road Safety Audit/Assessment
SRTS Safe Routes to School Program
STIP Statewide Transportation Improvement Program
STP Surface Transportation Program
TE Transportation Enhancement
THSIP Tribal Highway Safety Improvement Project
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TTAP Tribal Technical Assistance Program
TTIP Tribal Transportation Improvement Program
UDOT Utah Department of Transportation
WFLHD Western Federal Lands Highway Division
WisDOT Wisconsin Department of Transportation