USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Safety Programs

Ohio Local Road Safety Program's State and Local Collaboration Makes Safety a Local Priority

Summary from Assessment of Local Road Safety Funding, Training, and Technical Assistance: Benefit/Cost Tool and Local Road Safety Manual


Background

The Ohio Local Road Safety Program is a three-part collaboration among Ohio DOT (ODOT), the Ohio Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) center, and the County Engineers Association of Ohio (CEAO). The collaboration provides funding for local road safety improvements, offers training and technical assistance to local agencies, and assists with the administration of local safety projects.

ODOT dedicates $12 million of Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds annually to qualifying safety projects on county roads. The funds are administered by CEAO. ODOT also funds a position at CEAO to administer the county safety projects and provide technical assistance to counties as they develop and implement local safety projects. Once projects are approved for safety funding, they are administered by ODOT through the district offices or by local governments through the Office of Local Programs. The funding set aside specifically for county roads has enabled county engineers to take the lead in determining the improvement projects to fund. Providing funding for a CEAO position enables counties to administer projects with the assistance of the CEAO Program Manager.

Local agencies also are eligible to apply for HSIP funds through the statewide program managed by ODOT. Multidisciplinary committees review applications each year and award funds based on scored criteria and other factors, such as cost, compatibility between countermeasures and crash patterns, and relevance to the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). ODOT provides crash data and user-friendly tools to help local governments analyze safety challenges and justify public investments.

Ohio LTAP has developed educational, outreach, and Road Safety Audit (RSA) programs designed to build safety knowledge at the local level. Participation in RSA programs and training has increased now that an incentive is tied to local agency RSA participation. Typically ODOT will fund low-cost safety improvements on corridors or at spot locations where RSAs are conducted; however, if an RSA identifies the need for larger, more costly improvements, ODOT sends task order consultants to assess the problem and the costs.

Benefits

ODOT's partnerships with LTAP and CEAO have successfully made safety a local priority. With over 2,300 local agencies in Ohio, about 75 percent of these governments have taken advantage of the training, technical assistance, and tools provided by ODOT, Ohio LTAP, and CEAO.

Contact

FHWA Office of Safety staff contacts by safety function

Caltrans Uses Local Road Safety Manual to Improve its Data-driven Approach to Statewide Safety Project Selection

Summary from Assessment of Local Road Safety Funding, Training, and Technical Assistance: Benefit/Cost Tool and Local Road Safety Manual


Background

Fifty percent of California's Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds are dedicated to local roads. The approximately $100 million-per-year program is managed by the Caltrans Division of Local Assistance (DLA), which is responsible for programming the funds to local road safety projects. As a part of the process, DLA sets criteria for HSIP project applications, reviews applications for accuracy, and selects projects. The division does not identify the projects for the local jurisdictions or administer the projects once selected, but instead provides guidance, tools, and training so the local jurisdictions are empowered to make informed decisions on effective safety improvements.

When the HSIP program first started, the application process was very basic, but has evolved into a data-driven process. To improve Caltrans's overall data-driven approach to statewide safety project selection and to maximize the long-term safety improvements across California, DLA developed Local Roadway Safety: A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners. The manual provides an easy-to-use, straightforward, comprehensive framework of the steps and analysis tools local jurisdictions would need to proactively identify locations with roadway safety issues and the appropriate countermeasures.

Benefits

Developing this resource has improved local agencies' ability to perform benefit/cost calculations for project applications. Two-and-a-half years ago, the average benefit/cost ratio on a project was approximately 8, but currently it is approximately 13.5. Local agencies are submitting applications for projects with greater lifesaving benefits. Local agencies understand the necessity of the data-driven process. The division also has seen an increase in positive communication with local agencies.

Contact

FHWA Office of Safety staff contacts by safety function

Local Agencies in Six Louisiana Parishes Produce State's First Regional, Data-Driven Safety Action Plan

Original publication: 2013 National Roadway Safety Awards Noteworthy Practices Guide Publication FHWA-SA-14-002; 2013


"cover of the South Central Regional Transportation Safety Plan (Updated February 2013)"
Cover of SCRTSP

 

Description of Practice

The South Central Regional Transportation Safety Plan (SCRTSP) is the first regional, data-driven action plan developed in Louisiana as part of the State's efforts to implement its Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). The plan is a living document that adopts and disseminates the SHSP “Destination Zero Deaths” goals and strategies down to the regional and local levels. With ongoing support from Federal, State, and local agencies, the SCRTSP uses action plans to undertake regional and local projects addressing four emphasis areas (alcohol-related driving, occupant protection, crashes involving young drivers, and infrastructure and operations).

Key Accomplishments and Results

Measured reductions in alcohol-related serious injuries as well as in serious injuries resulting from lack of seatbelt use.

Contact

Kevin Belanger
South Central Planning and Development Commission
985-851-2900
kevin@scpdc.org

Thurston County, Washington, Public Works Department Applies Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool

Original publication: FHWA Safety Program | Systemic In Practice | Washington


Overview of Practice

The Thurston County Public Works Department used the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool to explore the potential benefits of proactive safety planning. Although Thurston County staff had experience conducting strategic safety planning in partnership with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), those efforts focused on site-specific safety improvements such as turn lanes, guardrail enhancement, and shoulder paving and widening.

Results

The Tool provided Thurston County a proactive, data driven and defensible approach to identifying curves for improvement prior to a severe crash occurring, rather than reacting after an incident has occurred. Upon conclusion of the systemic analysis, Thurston County applied for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funding using the results as documentation for the request. The WSDOT approved the grant and the County is moving forward with implementing the systemic countermeasures identified through this systemic analysis. The Tool also proved to present a process that is flexible and implementable by a local agency with limited funding and staffing resources. A benefit of working with the WSDOT to apply the systemic safety planning process is that the experience provided County staff an opportunity for greater involvement in Strategic Highway Safety Planning (SHSP) activities.

Contact

Scott Davis, P.E.
Traffic Engineering and Operations Manager
Thurston County Public Works
davissa@co.thurston.wa.us

New York State Department of Transportation Applies Systemic Planning Process to Lane Departure Crashes on State Highway System

Original publication: FHWA Safety Program | Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool | New York Case Study(PDF, 186kB)


Overview of Practice

The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) used the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool to identify sites where safety could be improved by deploying low-cost countermeasures on roadways with a high crash risk rather than just focusing on specific sites with a history of severe crashes.

Results

The Tool is beneficial because it provides a process to identify locations that would benefit from safety-related improvements that would not otherwise be identified through the traditional site-specific analysis process. The Tool also is flexible enough to be applied by NYSDOT staff in a central location and disseminated to region staff or to be applied by region staff at the local level. The countermeasures identified during the pilot along with the documentation of segment mileages with risk factors present will be useful tools in future systemic safety program development.

Contact

Regina Doyle
Office of Traffic Safety and Mobility
New York State Department of Transportation
RDoyle@dot.ny.gov

Missouri Department of Transportation Evaluation of Project Proves Systemic Planning Process is Beneficial

Original publication: FHWA Safety Program | Missouri Case Study(PDF, 202kB)


Overview of Practice

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) used the concepts discussed in the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool to evaluate a project that was developed using a systemic planning process. MoDOT evaluated the effects of adding edge line pavement markings to 570 miles of rural, two-lane State highways with average daily traffic volumes between 400 and 1000 vehicles.

Results

Crash data collected after the project provided proof that implementing low-cost countermeasures on low-volume roads with low-crash frequency and density yields a reduction in crashes. While evidence was stronger for total crashes, there was still a net reduction in fatal and severe injury crashes on improved corridors. Evaluation results can be used by decision-makers to decide whether to continue or discontinue funding or to implement a particular countermeasure for a focus crash type on a focus facility. In this manner, limited safety funding can be appropriately directed to the projects and locations that will produce the most benefit in terms of reduced crashes for the least investment.

Contact

John P. Miller, P.E.
Traffic Safety Engineer
Missouri Department of Transportation
573-526-1759
John.P.Miller@modot.mo.gov

Missouri's Blueprint to Arrive Alive Implements System-Wide Safety Improvements

Original publication: FHWA Safety Program | Systemic In Practice | Missouri(PDF, 279kB)


Overview of Practice

Missouri is one state that has been successful in identifying and implementing system-wide improvements. Missouri's Blueprint to Arrive Alive, which is the State's SHSP, identifies their “Targeted 10” strategies in education, enforcement, engineering, and public policy areas. The state uses Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding for many of these strategies, proactively incorporating the installation of rumble strips/stripes, improved signing and delineation, wider pavement markings, and improved shoulders into pavement resurfacing projects.

Results

Since 2007, almost two-thirds of Missouri's HSIP funds have been allocated to system-wide improvements. While overall results cannot be attributed to specific safety improvements, the evidence is compelling. Between 2005 and 2011, Missouri has seen a 37.5 percent drop in overall fatalities and a 46 percent reduction in lane departure fatalities. In addition, since the installation of cable median barriers on the Interstate system throughout the State, there has been an 80 percent reduction in cross-median crash fatalities on Missouri freeways.

"Line graph titled 'Freeway Cross-Median Fatalities and Median Guard Cable 2002-2011' shows that as Miles of Median Guard Cable increases Cross-Median Fatalities descreases. During the period of greatest increase in Miles of Median Guard Cable, 2004-2006, the greatest decrease in Cross-Medain Fatalities occurred."

Contact

John P. Miller, P.E.
Traffic Safety Engineer
Missouri Department of Transportation
573-526-1759
John.P.Miller@modot.mo.gov

Minnesota Makes Systemic Safety Improvements Based on Risk Assessments at County Level

Original publication: FHWA Safety Program | Practice - Minnesota(PDF, 426kB)


Overview of Practice

Minnesota DOT (Mn/DOT) is another example of a state implementing a systemic approach. While Missouri's approach is focused on state-maintained roadways, Minnesota has taken a different approach through the development of safety plans for each of state's 87 counties. The safety plans disaggregate the severe crash types by each of the AASHTO SHSP emphasis areas to identify emphasis and target crash types at the regional level. Mn/DOT has selected crash surrogates for various facility types to use in the risk assessment. Locations identified and included in the plans can be submitted for project funding through the HSIP.

Results

One example is a risk assessment based on curve radius. Evaluating the data against surrogate risk factors helped Minnesota identify curves with 500-1,200 foot radii to consider for systemic improvements.

"Vertical bar chart that shows that the majority of fatal crashes occurred with a curve radius of between 500 and 1200"

Contact

Bradley Estochen
State Safety Engineer
Minnesota Department of Transportation
651-234-7011
Bradley.Estochen@state.mn.us

Publication Year: 2011

Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Applies Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool on Behalf of Local Agencies

Original publication: Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Applies Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool on Behalf of Local Agencies(PDF, 417kB)


Overview of Practice

The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) applied the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool (Tool) to a local road system. Through the Federal Highway Administration Focus State Initiative, KYTC staff had previously conducted systemic planning focused on roadway departure crashes on State highways. This planning effort, however, did not analyze or suggest any improvements for rural county roads. In 2012, KYTC used the Tool to analyze county roadway corridors on behalf of local agency staff in five counties—Boyle, Bourbon, Franklin, Mercer, and Montgomery.

Results

The Tool proved beneficial for KYTC because it provided an easy-to-apply process to evaluate locally owned and operated roads. Applying the Tool did not require additional data gathering; all the data used in the analysis were based on available photo logs.

Contact

Tracy Lovell, P.E.
Transportation Engineer
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Tracy.Lovell@ky.gov

Washington Integrates its SHSP with Other State Plans and Programs

The Washington practice is discussed after the following introduction about SHSP integration.

Other states in this SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices series: DE, ID, ME, MD, ND


Introduction to SHSP Integration

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is a statewide-coordinated safety plan that provides a comprehensive framework for reducing the number of deaths and serious injuries on all public roads. In each State, the SHSP identifies the State's safety goals, objectives and key emphasis areas. It is intended to serve as an ‘umbrella’ plan that is integrated into other State transportation plans and guides the State's roadway safety investment decisions.

Integration Defined

Integration is the act of bringing together or incorporating various parts into a whole. Integration is relevant and important to a State's planning process because every State has numerous transportation plans; each one potentially addressing safety in a different way. The SHSP is the mechanism to bring these safety “parts” together to form a consistent and “whole” safety program for the State.

The Purpose and Benefits of Integration

The purpose of integration is to coordinate and focus the State's roadway safety efforts to maximize the State's ability to save lives.

Through integration, the safety needs of the State can be addressed more strategically and resources can be shared more effectively. As illustrated in Figure 1, integration encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly to save lives.

"Image shows three boxes pointing to one circle. The three boxes are above the circle. From right to left, the boxes read:  'Collective Action,' 'Common Goal(s),' and 'Leveraged Resources.' The circle reads 'Lives Saved.' The figure represents an integration process that encourages State partners to strive toward common goals, collectively implement appropriate strategies and actions, share resources to meet or exceed the State's goals and objectives, and most importantly, to save lives."

Other potential integration benefits include:

  • The use of consistent data and analysis methods.
  • Improved allocation of resources to more effectively produce safety improvements.
  • Improvements to safety culture across State, regional, and local agencies.
  • A reduction in the administrative burden on States and local agencies.

Integration of Plans and Processes

State transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans. The relationship of these plans is illustrated in Figure 2.

"The image is a work flow that shows the various state transportation plans and programs that the SHSP should be integrated with. These include the Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), State Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs), the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (TIPs), and various modal and regional transportation plans."

An integrated SHSP positions the State DOT and its safety partners to collectively address the State's safety challenges on all public roads through coordination and consistency among with the following State and regional plans and programs:

  • LRTPs to promote a long-range vision that incorporates safety priorities.
  • HSIP projects to be consistent with the SHSP emphasis areas and strategies.
  • STIPS/TIPS to align programming of projects with SHSP strategies and countermeasures.
  • CVSPs to facilitate exchange and collaboration between the commercial motor vehicle safety community and the broader safety community.
  • HSPs to ensure a consistent, data-driven approach to improving highway safety, especially in SHSP emphasis areas.

In addition, the SHSP should integrate with city and county planning processes to ensure consideration of safety concerns on all road types.

SHSP Integration Indicators

Indicators that the SHSP and other transportation plans and processes are integrated include the following:

  • Other transportation plans incorporate elements of the SHSP and include consistent and supporting safety goals, performance measures, objectives, and strategies.
  • The priorities and goals of other transportation programs and plans are considered when developing the SHSP.
  • Safety partners have access to and use of common safety data, analysis, and methods for determining safety priorities.
  • The SHSP is developed with sustained input from disciplines and agencies representing the 4Es of safety (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency medical services).
  • Safety partners assist in the implementation of SHSP strategies.
  • SHSP stakeholders and experts are included in other transportation planning processes.
  • SHSP priorities and strategies are considered in project prioritization and programming.
  • Various sources of funding are used to achieve safety goals.
  • Progress towards safety goals is measured jointly and regularly.

Washington

Background

The Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC) is an autonomous state agency responsible for coordinating traffic safety efforts throughout the state of Washington and leading the strategic highway safety plan (known as Target Zero®) development. The WTSC is made up of ten commissioners from State, county, and city government and is chaired by the Governor. The Steering Committee for updating Target Zero® includes representatives from 17 organizations including State, regional, Tribal, and nonprofit agencies. In addition, multi-agency teams have been established to analyze the data and identify and evaluate safety strategies based on stakeholder input.

Target Zero® is a “practitioner's plan” intended to unite the contributing agencies and organizations. The plan will coordinate traffic safety programs, better align priorities and strategies, and provide a common language and approach to traffic safety efforts across Washington State. The plan is data-driven, identifying the factors contributing to fatality and serious injury collisions on Washington roadways, as well as pointing out proven and recommended strategies for reducing traffic deaths and serious injuries.

SHSP Integration Practices

Collaborative Development

The WTSC and the WSDOT have worked collaboratively over the years to develop the SHSP and have established a set of model practices for soliciting and incorporating input from a diverse array of stakeholders when updating their Target Zero® plan. Partner organizations from all over the state have multiple opportunities to provide input—through surveys, active participation in a partners' meeting, and by submitting comments and ideas on drafts of the Plan.

To solicit input from partners throughout the State, the Steering Committee issued a survey and held a day-long partners meeting. For the partners meeting, the Steering Committee invited over 800 participants from public, nonprofit, and private organizations across the State. Approximately 180 participants attended the meeting representing Federal and state agencies, Native American Tribes, local law enforcement agencies, local transportation departments, state legislators, advocacy groups, regional planning councils, and technology companies. At the partners' meeting, WTSC presented statewide traffic safety data and held group strategy discussions with partners on safety priority areas, soliciting ideas. Those facilitated discussions resulted in lists of potential strategies to address each priority area.

Following the partner meeting, subject matter experts in each of the priority areas led multi-agency teams in developing chapters on each of the priority areas. They compiled past successes, documented future plans, and critically examined the potential approaches to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. This resulted in a list of proven strategies that any organization can use to develop their own traffic safety plans.

The strong partnerships among safety agencies in Washington State did not happen overnight. They have been fostered and strengthened over a decade of conscious effort. The SHSP update process in Washington State allows a great array of safety partners with diverse perspectives to come together to have strategic discussions based on a common set of data. Each update of Target Zero® has drawn more partners, which in turn has led to new ideas, changed attitudes and behaviors, and greater coordination of efforts.

Common Goals, Strategies and Measures

Target Zero® is coordinated with other plans, including the Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP), Highway Safety Plan (HSP), and the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP). Representatives from the agencies that steward these plans helped author the associated sections in Target Zero®.

Target Zero® sets common goals and safety strategies for State agencies and provides guidance to local agencies, nonprofit groups, and Tribes in Washington. The priorities identified in Target Zero® are guided by several factors including: the Governor's priorities as expressed in the Washington Transportation Plan, a careful review of traffic safety data and analysis, and input from partners. Target Zero® is intended to be incorporated into the plans and programs of key state traffic safety agencies, as well as other state agencies, Tribes, cities, counties, and private organizations. State agencies are required to integrate Target Zero® into their strategies and plans and it is strongly recommended for all law enforcement, engineering organizations, and any organization involved in traffic safety.

Federally funded programs administered by Washington State agencies set forth criteria to align the priorities and strategies identified in Target Zero®. WTSC also funds Target Zero® managers in local communities who are embedded in public agencies to facilitate traffic safety mobilizations, and implement and support proven Target Zero® strategies. This helps WTSC develop local partnerships and facilitate the implementation of proven safety strategies in key locations statewide.

Tribal Integration

The Steering Committee, which included Tribal representation, has made particular efforts to reach out to the 29 Federally Recognized Tribes located within the borders of Washington State for the Target Zero® update. In 2012, 12 Tribal members representing six Washington Tribes, participated in the partners' meeting and met for a special luncheon that day. Tribal representatives were invaluable in drafting the “Native American Tribes and Target Zero®” chapter of the Plan.

However, on an ongoing basis, Tribal and state representatives meet regularly to discuss transportation and traffic safety concerns. This sharing occurs at meetings of the Tribal Transportation Planning Organization and the Washington Indian Transportation Policy Advisory Committee. Tribes also actively participate on a Tribal Traffic Safety Advisory Board with the WTSC.

Key Accomplishments

  • Incorporated input from approximately 180 partners
  • Built strong safety partnerships with state, local, Tribal, and nonprofit agencies throughout the State
  • Incorporated input from Tribal representatives on safety strategies for reservation roadways
  • Set common data-driven goals and proven safety strategies for State, local, and Tribal agencies

See these other SHSP Integration Noteworthy Practices:

Contact

Darrin Grondel
Washington Traffic Safety Commission
(360) 725-9899
DGrondel@wtsc.wa.gov