USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Safety Programs

Zero Traffic Fatalities Task Force and Speed Limit Setting Report – California

Vision Zero Success Story – Partnerships


Background

Motor vehicle collisions are a leading cause of unintentional injuries and deaths among all age groups in the United States. In 2017, approximately 3,600 deaths and over 14,000 serious injuries occurred as a result of traffic collisions in California, costing the State over $53.5 billion. Twenty-six percent of the collisions were speeding-related, which included vehicle speeds that were unsafe for conditions or in excess of the speed limit.

This spurred the legislature into action and in 2018, the California Assembly signed Assembly Bill 2363. This Bill required the establishment of a Zero Traffic Fatalities Task Force. The Task Force aimed to evaluate the ways in which speed limits are set in California, suggested alternatives to the current speed-limit-setting process (85th-percentile method), and proposed policies to reduce traffic fatalities to zero. AB 2363 directed the California Secretary of Transportation to publish a Report of Findings following the conclusion of the Task Force activities and submit it to the Legislature.

Systemic Safety Analysis – San Diego, California

Vision Zero Success Story – Data


Background

In 2015, the City of San Diego adopted a Vision Zero approach to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries on City streets by 2025. This approach included the development and implementation of strategies in the areas of engineering, enforcement, and education. A key element of the City’s Vision Zero program was to use data to select projects with the greatest safety benefit. This data-driven philosophy was encapsulated in the City’s Systemic Safety Analysis Reporting Program (SSARP). The Safe Transportation Research and Education Center at the University of California, Berkeley assisted with the development of SSARP, which included standardizing processes to perform crash analyses, identifying safety issues, and developing a list of low-cost proven safety countermeasures. The systemic safety approach evaluated the City’s entire roadway network, rather than individual high-crash locations, and identified high-risk roadway features correlated with common crash types.

State Programs Fund Rail Crossing Safety Improvements


Describe the state of roadway safety before the practice was implemented. What was the safety issue, problem, or gap?

Indiana and Nebraska needed a funding tool to help communities reduce rail crossing crashes and fatalities and to realize projects that had been unable to move forward.

What key challenges needed to be addressed before the practice could be implemented?

The key challenge was developing the respective communities’ funding tools.

Describe the practice.

As part of Indiana’s long-term transportation funding legislation, passed in 2017, lawmakers approved the Local TRAX rail overpass program to help communities reduce rail crossing crashes and fatalities. To fund the program, the Indiana Finance Authority will issue and distribute bonds.

"Local Trax | Rail Overpass Program"

Nebraska’s Grade Separation fund charges a $0.075 excise tax for each train mile operated by a railroad that transports freight in the State, and a $100 tax for each public grade crossing on the railroad’s line in the State. Every year, each railroad submits to the Department of Revenue a report of total train miles operated in the State during the previous year and the number of public grade crossings on its line. A total of 10 railroad entities that haul freight are taxed under this program. On average, the program generates approximately $3 million of revenue per year.

What technical and/or institutional changes resulted from the practice?

The Local TRAX program requires local governments to provide 20 percent of funding for land acquisition and construction, with the remaining 80 percent provided by the State. This funding match can be reached through any local partnership, including funding from the host railroad. Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) will also pay 100 percent of design and inspection fees for projects awarded under this program.

Nebraska Department of Transportation (NDOT) Grade Separation Committee oversees and manages grade separation funds, which must be used for construction, rehabilitation, relocation, or modification of railroad grade separation facilities. New grade separation projects require closing a minimum of two public at-grade crossings: one at or near the location of the structure, and one or more at locations selected and approved by NDOT and the applicable local government. From 2000 to 2019, grade separation funds have helped construct 15 viaducts and approximately 30 grade crossings closures.

What benefits were realized as a result of the practice?

In 2018, INDOT awarded more than $121 million in State-matched funds to 12 communities to pursue high-priority railroad grade separations, crossing closures, and other safety enhancements at railroad crossings.

NDOT believes the train mile tax works well in Nebraska because it helps increase the number of grade separation construction projects, which in turn increases collaboration with railroads on transportation solutions. NDOT and the railroad companies share a common interest in hazard elimination, safety, and efficiency at crossings, and the train mile tax helps to financially achieve those goals.

Idaho Transportation Department Uses Interactive Web-based “Story Maps” to Support Robust Public Involvement


Background

Idaho is experiencing substantial growth in population. This, in turn, is placing new pressure on the State’s transportation systems, including infrastructure and safety. As the need for expanded transportation options increases, so does the potential impact of these projects on communities and stakeholders. Because of this, the need for public involvement in transportation operation, safety, and planning in Idaho is at an all-time high.

Virginia Uses SMART SCALE to Evaluate Safety Benefits of Proposed Projects


Background

To ensure the best use of limited transportation funds when selecting projects for the State’s long-range transportation plan, the Virginia Department of Transportation uses the SMART SCALE tool to help establish priorities. Transportation projects are scored on an outcome-based process that is transparent to the public and aids decision makers in making sound transportation investments.