The risk ratio compares the severity of crashes associated with a particular factor to the severity of all other crashes (e.g., the percentage of angle crashes that result in a serious injury or fatality divided by the percentage among all other crashes, excluding angle crashes). Crash types or factors with a risk ratio greater than 1 are overrepresented with respect to severe crashes. Formally, the risk ratio is defined by the following equation.
Figure C.1 Equation. Risk Ratio

Where:
A = the number of severe crashes of a particular type or emphasis area;
B = the total number of nonsevere crashes of the same type as in A;
C = the number of severe crashes, excluding those of the same type as in A; and
D = the total number of nonsevere crashes, excluding those of the same type as in A.
To illustrate this concept further, a few examples are provided below. Conventionally, data used to compute the risk ratio (variables A, B, C, and D) are arranged in a 2×2 matrix, where the first row corresponds to the numerator values in the formula above, and the second row corresponds to the denominator values.
| Severe Crash | Not a Severe Crash | Total Crashes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rural Area | 523 (A) | 5,768 (B) | 6,291 (A+B) |
| Not a Rural Area (Urban Area) | 700 (C) | 24,396 (D) | 25,096 (C+D) |
Source: Sample data, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 2015.
Given this data, the formula to calculate the risk ratio is as follows:
Figure C.2 Equation. Severe Crash Risk Ratio for Rural Areas
![]()
Based on this calculation, crashes in rural areas are around three times more likely to result in a fatality or serious injury than those in urban areas.
A similar example for DUI crashes is provided here:
| Severe Crash | Not a Severe Crash | Total Crashes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUI | 201 (A) | 1,589 (B) | 1,790 (A+B) |
| Not a DUI | 1,022 (C) | 28,575 (D) | 29,597 (C+D) |
Source: Sample data, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 2015.
Figure C.3 Equation. Severe Crash Risk Ratio for DUI Crashes
![]()
A risk ratio can also be developed for a combination of factors. An example for DUI crashes in rural areas is shown here:
| Severe Crash | Not a Severe Crash | Total Crashes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rural DUI Crash | 93 (A) | 597 (B) | 690 (A+B) |
| Not a Rural DUI Crash | 1,130 (C) | 29,567 (D) | 30,697 (C+D) |
Source: Sample data, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 2015.
Figure C.4 Equation. Severe Crash Risk Ratio for DUI Crashes in Rural Areas
![]()
As an outcome of this step, the transportation planner would understand the categories of crashes by type, severity, contributing factor, or geography that may be a focus for planning and programming or that should be a consideration in nonsafety-specific projects.