USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation
FHWA Highway Safety Programs

REFERENCES

  1. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.
  2. Implementation the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. https://archive.transportation.org/. Accessed July 2008.
  3. Falk, K.W. and P.J. Carlson. Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity Workshop: Summary Report. FHWA-SA-08-003, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2008.
  4. National Association of County Engineers website. http://www.countyengineers.org/ Accessed July 1, 2008.
  5. Bureau of Transportation Statistics website. http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/2004/html/table_01_04.html. Accessed July 1, 2008.
  6. Hall, J. W. Evaluation of Wide Edge Lines. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1114, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 21-27.
  7. Cottrell, B. H. Evaluation of Wide Edge Lines on Two-Lane Rural Roads. Publication FHWA-VA-85-37. Virginia Highway and Transportation Research Council, Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, Virginia, 1987.
  8. Hughes, W. E., H. W. McGee, S. Hussain, and J. Keegel. Field Evaluation of Edge Line Widths. Publication FHWA-89-111. Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1989.
  9. Musick, J. V. Effect of Pavement Edge Marking on Two-Lane Rural State Highways in Ohio. Highway Research Board Bulletin 266, 1962, pp. 1-7.
  10. Basile, A.J. Effect of Pavement Edge Markings on Traffic Accidents in Kansas. In Highway Research Board Bulletin 308, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1962, pp. 80-86.
  11. The 1981 Highway Safety Stewardship Report. Report of the Secretary of Transportation to the United States Congress, Office of Highway Safety, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., April 1981.
  12. T. Miller. Benefit-Cost Analysis of Lane Marking. In Transportation Research Record 1334, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 38-45.
  13. Bali, S., R. Potts, A. Fee, I. Taylor, and J. Glennon. Cost-Effectiveness and Safety of Alternative Roadway Delineation Treatments for Rural Two-Lane Highways. Publication FHWA-RD-78-50. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1978.
  14. Bahar, G., M. Masliah, R. Wolff, and P. Park. Desktop Reference for Crash Reduction Factors. Publication FHWA-SA-07-015. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., September 200
  15. Elvik, R., and T. Vaa. The Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
  16. Cottrell, B. H. Evaluation of Wide Edge Lines on Two-Lane Rural Roads. In Transportation Research Record 1160, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 35-44.
  17. SAFETEA-LU, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/fact_sheets/ftsht1907.cfm. Accessed July 2008.
  18. Hauer, E. Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science, Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.
  19. Huberty, T., and M. Swenson. SDDOT Customer Study. Report SD97-01F. South Dakota Department of Transportation, Pierre, South Dakota, 1997.
  20. Bender, D., and J. Schamber. SDDOT 1999 Customer Satisfaction Assessment. Report SD98-17-F. South Dakota Department of Transportation, Pierre, South Dakota, 2000.
  21. Ward, A.M. Sighting Safety. In Effectiveness of Highway Safety Improvements. Proceedings of the conference. American Society of Civil Engineers. New York, NY, 1985.
  22. Ohme, P. J. Enhancing Nighttime Pavement Marking Visibility for Older Drivers. Master’s Thesis. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 2001.
  23. Pietrucha, M. T., R. S. Hostetter, L. Staplin, and M. Obermeyer. Pavement Markings and Delineation for Older Drivers. Final Report. Publication FHWA-RD-94-145. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1996.
  24. Ethen, J. L., and H. L. Woltman. Minimum Retroreflectance for Nighttime Visibility of Pavement Markings. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1093, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 43-47.
  25. Graham, J. R., and L. E. King. Retroreflectivity Requirements for Pavement Markings. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1316. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 18-23.
  26. Graham, J. R., J. K. Harrold, and L. E. King. Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity Requirements for Older Drivers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1529. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 65-70.
  27. Loetterle, F. E., R. A. Beck, and J. Carlson. Public Perception of Pavement Marking Brightness. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1715, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 51-59.
  28. Parker, N. A. Evaluation of the Performance of Permanent Pavement Markings and Retroreflectors in Snowplowable Raised Pavement Markers. Report 55657-01-13. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, New Jersey, 2002.
  29. Serviceable Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity Levels, Research in Progress, Transportation Research Board. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/16849. Accessed July 2008.
  30. Cirillo, J. A. Interstate System Crash Research; Study II, Interim Report II. Public Roads, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1968, pp. 71-76.
  31. Solomon, D. Crashes on Main Rural Highways Related to Speed, Driver and Vehicle. Bureau of Public Roads. U.S. Department of Commerce, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1964.
  32. Van Driel, C. J. G., R. J. Davidse, and M. F. A. M. van Maarseveen. The Effects of an Edge Line on Speed and Lateral Position: A Meta-analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2004, pp. 671-682.
  33. Sun, X., and V. O. Tekell. Impact of Edge Lines on Safety of Rural Two-Lane Highways. LTRC Report 414. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, October 2005.
  34. Donnell, E. T., D. Lee, J. Molino, and K. S. Opiela. Can Pavement Marking Curve Delineation Improve the Consistency of Vehicle Speed and Lane Position?: Results from a Nighttime Driving Experiment. Paper No. 07-0943. Proceedings from TRB Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
  35. Tsyganov, A. R., R. B. Machemehl, N. M. Warrenchuk, and Y. Wany. Before-After Comparison of Edge Line Effects on Rural Two-Lane Highways. CTR Technical Report 0-5090-2. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 2006.
  36. Taylor, J. L., H. W. McGee, E. L. Sequin, and R. S. Hostetter. NCHRP Report 130 Roadway Delineation Systems. Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1972.
  37. Stimpson, W. A., H. W. McGee, W. K. Kittelson, and R. H. Ruddy. Field Evaluation of Selected Delineation Treatments on Two-Lane Rural Highways. Publication FHWA-RD-77-118. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1977.
  38. Cottrell, B. H. The Effects of Wide Edge Lines on Lateral Placement and Speed on Two-Lane Rural Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1069, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 1-6.
  39. Kopf, J. Reflectivity of Pavement Markings: Analysis of Retroreflectivity Degradation Curves. Publication WA-RD 592.1. Washington State Transportation Center, Seattle, Washington, September 2004.
  40. Migletz, J., J. Graham, D. Harwood, and K. Bauer. Service Life of Durable Pavement Markings. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1749. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 13-21.
  41. Dravitzki, V. K., S. M. Wilkie, and T. J. Lester. The Safety Benefits of Brighter Roadmarkings. Research Report 310. Land Transport New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006.
  42. Molino, J. A., K. S. Opiela, C. K. Andersen, and M. J. Moyer. Relative Luminance of Retroreflective Raised Pavement Markers and Pavement Marking Stripes on Simulated Rural Two-Lane Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1844, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 45-51.
  43. Bahar, J., M. Masliah, T. Erwin, E. Tan, E. Hauer. Pavement Marking Materials and Markers: Real-World Relationship Between Retroreflectivity and Safety Over Time. NCHRP Web-Only Document 92, submitted 2006, http://www.trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=6475, Accessed July 1, 2008.
  44. Donnell, E. T., and S. Sathyanarayanan. Exploring the Statistical Association between Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity and Traffic Crash Frequency on Two- and Multi-lane Highways in North Carolina. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, August 2007.
  45. Smadi, O., R. R. Souleyrette, D. Ormand, and N. R. Hawkins. An Analysis of the Safety-Effectiveness of Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity. TRB 87th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers DVD, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., January 2008.
  46. Higgins, L., J. Miles, P. Carlson, F. Aktan, and D. Burns. The Nighttime Visibility of Prototype Work Zone Markings Under Dry, Wet, and Raining Conditions. Paper No. 09-2043, Submitted to TRB’s 88th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., January 2009.
  47. Aktan, F., and T. Schnell. Performance Evaluation of Pavement Markings under Dry, Wet, and Rainy Conditions in the Field. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1877, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 38-49.
  48. Finley, M. D., P. J. Carlson, N. D. Trout, and D. L. Jasek. Sign and Pavement Marking Visibility from the Perspective of Commercial Vehicle Drivers. Report 0-4269-1, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas, September 2002.
  49. Obeng-Boampong, K., J. Miles, A. Pike, and P. Carlson. Use of Wider Pavement Markings - Survey of State Transportation Agencies. Paper No. 09-1113, Submitted to TRB’s 88th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., January 2009.
  50. Zwahlen, H. T., and T. Schnell. Visibility of New Pavement Markings at Night under Low-Beam Illumination. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1495, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 117-127.
  51. COST 331—Requirements for Road Marking: State of the Art. European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research, European Commission Directorate-General for Transport, May 1999.
  52. Carlson, P. J., J. D. Miles, A. M. Pike, and E. S. Park. Evaluation of Wet-Weather and Contrast Pavement Marking Applications: Final Report. Publication FHWA/TX-05/0-5008-2. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas, March 2007.
  53. Gibbons, R. B. Pavement Marking Visibility Requirements during Wet Night Conditions. Report VTRC-07-CR7. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Virginia, November 2006.
  54. McKnight, A. S. The Effect of Lane Line Width and Contrast upon Lane Keeping. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Elsevier Science Ltd., United Kingdom, September 1998, pp. 617-624.
  55. Deballion, C., P. J. Carlson, Y. He, T. Schnell, and F. Aktan. Updates to Research on Recommended Minimum Levels for Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity to Meet Driver Night Visibility Needs, Final Report. Publication FHWA- HRT-07-059. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., October 2007.