USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation
FHWA Highway Safety Programs

Safety Eligibility Letter WZ-188

Hardware Type:
Work Zone Devices
Code:
WZ-188
Date:
Testing Criteria:
NCHRP 350
Manufacturer:
Traffic Safety Store
Device Description:
New Sentry TM Longitudina Channelizing Barricade (LCB) as a test level 1 (TL-1)
View PDF:
wz188.pdf (114.04 KB)

 

October 6, 2004

Refer to: HSA-10/WZ-188

Mr. William Snook
The Traffic Safety Store
P.O. Box 33
Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania 19317

Dear Mr. Snook:

This is in response to the letter of August 5, 2004, requesting Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) acceptance of the New SentryTM longitudinal channelizing barricade (LCB) as a test level 1 (TL-1) crashworthy traffic control device for use in work zones on the National Highway System (NHS). It was requested that we find these devices acceptable for use on the NHS based on its similarity to the previously tested "Off-the-Wall" LCB, under the provisions of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 "Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features."

Introduction
The FHWA guidance on crash testing of work zone traffic control devices is contained in two memoranda. The first, dated July 25, 1997, titled "INFORMATION: Identifying Acceptable Highway Safety Features," established four categories of work zone devices: Category I devices are those lightweight devices which are to be self-certified by the vendor, Category II devices are other lightweight devices which need individual crash testing but with reduced instrumentation, Category III devices are barriers and other fixed or heavy devices also needing crash testing with normal instrumentation, and Category IV devices are trailer mounted lighted signs, arrow panels, etc. for which crash testing requirements have not yet been established. The second guidance memorandum was issued on August 28, 1998, and is titled "INFORMATION: Crash Tested Work Zone Traffic Control Devices." This later memorandum lists devices that are acceptable under Categories I, II, and III.

The New SentryTM LCB units are rotationally molded of low density polyethylene (LDPE) and are 36 inches tall and 48 inches long, weighing 50 pounds empty. The wall thickness is a nominal 0.20 inches. The units are 20 inches wide at the base, tapering to 10 inches wide at the top. They can be filled with up to 100 gallons of water for a total weight of 884 pounds per unit. Patented U-shaped connectors are used to keep adjacent units together and prevent movement during minor hits.

Testing
The New SentryTM is comparable in design to the crash-tested LCB, the MB-48x40 Multi-Barrier. The Multi-Barrier LCB units are also rotationally molded of LDPE and are 48 inches tall and 40 inches long, weighing 50 pounds empty. The wall thickness is also 0.20 inches, however the profile is different, ranging from 23 inches wide at the base to 6 inches wide at the top. The Multi-Barrier can also be filled with up to 100 gallons of water. Full-scale automobile testing was conducted on the Multi-Barrier and reported in the FHWA acceptance letter WZ-135 as a TL-1 (50 km/hr) Longitudinal Channelizing Barricade. The crash test matrix was a modification of both the NCHRP Report 350 tests for longitudinal barriers and work zone traffic control devices. The pick up truck and small car crash tests were conducted as if the test article was a redirective barrier, but it was understood that the LCB would allow penetration by the test vehicle. The results are summarized in the table below:

Test Number10-9718-002 10-9718-003
NCHRP 350 Test #1-10 (Pick Up Truck)1-11 (Small Car)
Test Article Off-The-Wall Multi-Barrier MB 48x48
Length of test article30 Sections (30.5 m, 100 ft)30 Sections (30.5 m, 100 ft)
Mass of individual units22.7 kg (50 pounds)22.7 kg (50 pounds)
Mass of water ballast418 kg (921 pounds)418 kg (921 pounds)
Vehicle inertial mass2011 kg (4433 pounds)826 kg (1820 pounds)
Impact speed51.25 km/h (31.8 mph) 49.16 km/h (30.5 mph)
Impact angle25.0 degrees 20.2 degrees
Occupant impact speed 4.78 m/s 6.78 m/s
Ridedown acceleration -3.45 g's -3.77 g's
Trajectory Vehicle penetrated, stopped Vehicle penetrated system
Vehicle damage Minor, to grill and hoodMinor, to grill and hood
Occup. compartment intrusionNoneNone
Windshield damageNo ContactNo Contact

Findings
As expected the vehicle penetrated the installation. The occupant impact velocity of the small car exceeded that for a work zone traffic control device, but the occupant impact velocities and accelerations in both tests were within those specified for a barrier. The results of the testing met the unique requirements established for water-filled LCBs and, therefore, were found acceptable for use. You have received permission from Off-the-Wall Products to use the information from the Multi-Barrier crash tests to support the request for acceptance. In addition, it was requested that certain polyethylene plastics from Exxon Chemical Americas or Equistar Chemicals be allowed as alternate materials. We concur in this request, and will retain the product information on file.

We concur in the assertion that the New SentryTM LCB, which is 12 inches shorter in height and 8 inches longer in length than the Multi-Barrier, should perform in similar manner to the tested Multi-Barrier. It was also indicated that this may be considered a temporary situation as Off-the-Wall Products intends to conduct TL-3 testing on the New SentryTM LCB system in the near future. Therefore, the New SentryTM LCB described above and detailed in the enclosed drawings are acceptable for use on the NHS as the NCHRP Report 350 TL-1 device when proposed by a State.

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to the FHWA letters of acceptance:

  • Our acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the devices and does not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
  • Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the device will require a new acceptance letter.
  • Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the device being marketed is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, it reserves the right to modify or revoke its acceptance.
  • You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance.
  • You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for acceptance, and that they will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and the NCHRP Report 350.
  • To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance, designated as number WZ-188 shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter, and the test documentation upon which this letter is based, is public information. All such letters and documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request.
  • The New SentryTM LCB is a patented device and is considered "proprietary." The use of proprietary work zone traffic control devices in Federal-aid projects is generally of a temporary nature. They are selected by the contractor for use as needed and removed upon completion of the project. Under such conditions they can be presumed to meet requirement "a" given below for the use of proprietary products on Federal-aid projects. On the other hand, if proprietary devices are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects they: (a) must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists or; (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. These provisions do not apply to exempt non-NHS projects. Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411, a copy of which is enclosed.
  • This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, manufacture, or sell any patented device for which the applicant is not the patent holder. The acceptance letter is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the candidate device, and the FHWA is neither prepared nor required to become involved in issues concerning patent law. Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.

 

Sincerely yours,

/Original Signed by/

John R. Baxter, P.E.
Director, Office of Safety Design
Office of Safety