USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation
FHWA Highway Safety Programs

Safety Eligibility Letter CC-36C

Hardware Type:
Barrier Terminals and Crash Cushions
Code:
CC-36C
Date:
Manufacturer:
Impact Absorption, Inc.
Device Description:
Supplemental test (3-52) @ TL-3
View PDF:
cc36c.pdf (49.42 KB)

November 6, 2002

HSA-10/CC36C

Mr Michael Kempen
Impact Absorption, Inc.
46-06 245th Street
Douglaston, NY 11362

Dear Mr. Kempen:

Your October 6 letter to Mr. Richard Powers of my staff requested formal acknowledgement that the modified Vanderbilt Truck-Mounted Attenuator (VTMA) successfully passed NCHRP Report 350 test 3-52.  The modified VTMA design, originally deemed crashworthy by Mr. Frederick G. Wright, Jr. in a February 13, 2001 letter, added support wheels and an impact face to the original VMTA, which was cantilevered from the support vehicle and supported by a wire rope/steel boom assembly.  As you noted in your letter, test 3-52 is currently one of two optional TMA tests identified in Report 350.  To support your request, you also submitted a copy of the Transportation Research Center Inc. April 2002 test report, "NCHRP Report 350 Test 3-52 of the Vanderbilt Truck-Mounted Attenuator" and a videotape of the crash test.

Test 3-52 requires a 100-km/h impact at zero degrees with a 2000-kg pickup truck striking the attenuator with the centerline of the pickup truck offset one-third of the pickup truck width from the centerline of the TMA.  Your test was run within these parameters with a maximum reported occupant impact velocity of 11.8 m/s and a maximum ridedown acceleration of 13.1 g's.  Vehicle pitch and roll did not exceed 5 degrees.  Following impact, the 8736 kg support vehicle rolled ahead 8.4 m.

Based on the reported test results, I concur that the VMTA met NCHRP Report 350 evaluation criteria for test 3-52.

Sincerely yo

urs,

(original signed by Harry W. Taylor)

for:

Carol H. Jacoby, P.E.
Director, Office of Safety Design