Safety Eligibility Letter B-42B
1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20590
July 17, 2009
In Reply Refer To:
HSSD/B-42B
Mr. Michael Budd
Rockingham Precast
P.O. Box 1347
Harrisonburg, VA 22801
Dear Mr. Budd:
This letter is in response to your request for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) acceptance of a roadside safety device for use on the National Highway System (NHS).
Name of system: | 12-Foot T-LOC F-Shape Portable Concrete Barrier |
---|---|
Type of system: | Temporary concrete barrier |
Test Level: | AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Test Level-3 |
Testing conducted by: | Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) on May 5, 2009 |
Date of request: | February 10, 2009 |
Initial response by email sent February 23, 2009 |
You subsequently requested that we formally find this device acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Test Level-3 (TL-3).
Requirements
Roadside safety devices should meet the guidelines contained in the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). The FHWA Memorandum "ACTION: Identifying Acceptable Highway Safety Features" of July 25, 1997, provides further guidance on crash testing requirements of longitudinal barriers.
Description
The Rockingham Precast T-LOC barrier was originally accepted on October 20, 1997, in our Acceptance Letter B-42. The barrier tested was composed of 32-inch high, 12-foot long concrete F-Shape segments using a connection detail specifying 32-inch long slotted tube (4 inches × 4 inches × ½ inches) and mating fabricating 'T' made of ½-inch thick steel.
Your present request is for formal acceptance of 32-inch high, 12-foot long concrete F-Shape barrier segments using a connection detail specifying 12-inch long slotted tube connection (HSS4 × 4 × 1/2) anchored to the end of barrier segments using four #6 dowel bars 24 inches in length welded to the sides of the slotted tube (two on each side). The width of the slot in the tube was 1 inch. The interlocking mating "T" connection was fabricated using ½-inch thick steel plate. The width and length of the "T" connection was 2 inches and 12 inches respectively. The "T" connection was anchored to the ends of the barrier units using three #6 bars, 36 inches in length, and welded to the "T" connection steel. These bars, along with the bars welded to the slotted tube connection, were cast within the barrier concrete for each unit. Both the slotted tube and the "T" connection were located 10 inches from the base of the barrier unit. Each barrier unit was reinforced using three #5 longitudinal reinforcing bars, 11 feet, 8 inches in length. These bars were lapped with the three bars anchoring the "T" connection. The longitudinal reinforcing bars were skewed to lap with the dowel bars used to anchor the slotted tube connection.
The Office of Safety questioned the strength of the 12-inch long connection detail and requested that you conduct MASH Test 3-11, which you did. The vehicle was redirected and remained upright, and the occupant risk values were within the limits set by MASH. The test data summary sheet is attached for reference.
Findings
We concur in your request that the modified T-LOC concrete barrier segments that have been successfully crash tested to AASHTO MASH TL-3 conditions at a segment length of 12 feet will be considered acceptable for use on the NHS connection details when the segments are manufactured to a length of 12 feet. Please note the following standard provisions that apply to the FHWA letters of acceptance:
- This acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the devices and does not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
- Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the device will require a new acceptance letter.
- Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the device being marketed is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke our acceptance.
- You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance.
- You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for acceptance, and that it will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and the AASHTO
MASH. - To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance is designated as number B-42B and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request.
- T-LOC concrete barriers are patented products and considered proprietary. If proprietary devices are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects, except exempt, non-NHS projects, (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411.
- This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, manufacture, or sell any patented device for which the applicant is not the patent holder. The acceptance letter is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the candidate device, and the FHWA is neither prepared nor required to become involved in issues concerning patent law. Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.
Sincerely yours,
|